Potyvirus resistance in potato

ABSTRACT

The present invention is drawn to novel genes from wild plants, such as wild potato and pepper plants, that confer potyvirus resistance to plants, such as in transformed cultivated plants. Also encompassed are cultivated plants transformed with the novel gene, food products made from the transformed cultivated plants, and methods for making such plants and food products.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/275,897,filed on Oct. 18, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/394,081 filed on Oct. 18, 2010 and U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/482,579 filed on May 4, 2011, all of which are herebyincorporated by reference.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has beensubmitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Dec. 9, 2011, isnamed 58951398.txt and is 116,499 bytes in size.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is in the field of agrogenomics and plant geneticmodification to produce plants with altered traits, such as PVYresistance, or improved PVY resistance compared to non-modified oruntransformed plants.

BACKGROUND

Potyvirus infection of potato plants results in a variety of symptomsdepending on the viral strain. These symptoms include production loss,leaf curling, mild mottling, rapid death of the infected area and areasurrounding the infection, distorted and brittle leaves, wrinkled andrough leaves and the potato tuber necrotic ringspot disease. Necroticringspots render potatoes unmarketable and can therefore result in asignificant loss of income. Potyviruses are transmissible by aphidvectors but may also remain dormant in seed potatoes. This means thatusing the same line of potato for production of seed potatoes forseveral consecutive generations will lead to a progressive increase inviral load and subsequent loss of crop.

Recessive resistance against specific potyvirus strains can beassociated with one or several amino acid substitutions of the eIF4Eprotein in tomato, pepper, melon, barley, lettuce, and pea (FIG. 1).Although these substitutions appear clustered, it has proven difficultto design new versions of eIF4E mediating disease resistance.

eIF4E gene-mediated resistance is recessive, but it has been shown thatthe pepper gene pvr1 provides dominant potyvirus resistance whenoverexpressed in tomato (Kang et al., Plant Biotechnol J 5: 526-536).

It is impossible to develop potyvirus resistance in tetraploid potato byusing TILLING (Piron et al., PLoS ONE 5, 2010). This method requires theuse of inbred lines (which cannot be produced in tetraploid potato) andbackcrossing (to segregate the trait with undesirable mutations inducedby whole-genome mutagenesis treatments). Because potato is highlyheterozygote and suffers from inbreeding depression, backcrossingresults in reduced fitness and may trigger seedling death.

Nothing is known yet about the molecular basis of potyvirus resistancein potato and its sexually-compatible “wild potato” relatives. This lackof knowledge made it impossible to incorporate resistance into existingvarieties through all-native DNA transformation, a new approach togenetic engineering that is perceived as more acceptable by consumers.

The potato eIF4E protein has a 46-amino acid domain with the consensussequence DX₁X₂ X₃X₄K SX₅Q X₆AW GSS X₇RX₈ X₉YT FSX₁₀ VEX₁₁ FWX₁₂ X₁₃YNNIH X₁₄P S KLX₁₅ X₁₆GA D (SEQ ID NO: 38), whereby either at least one ofthe neutral amino acids (“X”) is substituted by a charged amino acid orat least one of the charged amino acids is substituted by a neutralamino acid or an amino acid having an opposite charge. See U.S. Pat. No.7,919,677. It is also confirmed that replacement of (i) the neutralamino acid X₃ by the negative amino acid glutamate (E), or (ii) theneutral amino acid X₇ by the positive amino acid arginine (R) may yieldpotyvirus resistance. See U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,462 B2. These studies alsoindicated that resistance may be obtained by replacing amino acid atposition 8 by an arginine.

Potato is sexually compatible with hundreds of wild potato species,which means that it is part of an unusually large and diverse gene pool.However, despite this remarkable competitive advantage, none of thecurrently available potato varieties displays resistance against theagronomically-important potyvirus pathogen potato virus Y (PVY).

SUMMARY

One aspect of the present technology is a method for conferring PVYresistance to a plant for at least a period of time, comprising:

(A) expressing at least one of (i) the full-length pwp1 gene comprisingthe sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or (ii) the full-length pwp2 genecomprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 in a cell of a plant; or

(B) expressing at least one of (i) a full-length pwp1 gene comprisingthe sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or (ii) the full-length pwp2 genecomprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, in a cell of a plant and alsodownregulating the expression of the plant's endogenous eIF4E gene; or

(C) expressing at least one of (i) an N-terminal-truncated fragment ofSEQ ID NO:2 or (ii) an N-terminal-truncated fragment of SEQ ID NO: 4; or

(D) mutating the sequence of the plant's endogenous eIF4E gene tocomprise at least two point mutations from the group consisting of i)T44A, (ii) S68N, (iii) I70T, (iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii)V128I, (viii) A130S, (ix) S172N and (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO: 6, or (i)T10M, (ii) A23G, (iii) Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ ID NO: 6 thatconfer resistance to PVY for at least a period of time (mutatedsequences disclosed as SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84, respectively);

wherein the plant is either fully resistant to PVY virus infection, ordevelops one or more symptoms of PVY disease after a period of time.

In one embodiment, the fragments are selected from the group consistingof: (i) SEQ ID NO: 20, (ii) SEQ ID NO: 21.

In another embodiment, the period of time is selected from the groupconsisting of (i) 1-3 days; (ii) 3-5 days; (iii) 5-7 days; (iv) 7-9days; (v) 9-11 days; (vi) 11-13 days; (vii) 13-15 days; (viii) 2-3weeks; (ix) 3-4 weeks; (x) 4-5 weeks; (xi) 5-7 weeks; (xii) 7-10 weeks;(xii) 2-3 months and (xiii) 3-5 months.

In another embodiment, the plant is selected from the group consistingof: (i) potato, (ii) tomato, (iii) lettuce and (iv) pepper.

In another embodiment, the plant possesses one or more additional traitsselected from the group consisting of: (i) low reducing sugar, (ii) lowfree asparagines, (iii) low bruising, (iv) reduced cold-inducedsweetening, (v) low acrylamide, (vi) resistance to Phytophthora, (vii)reduced starch phosphate level and (viii) increased antioxidant.

Another aspect of the present technology is a method of transforming aplant to be fully resistant to PVY virus disease, or to resist the onsetof one or more symptoms of PVY disease for a period of time, comprisingtransforming the plant with a polynucleotide encoding a protein with asequence selected from the group consisting of: (i) SEQ ID NO: 26, (ii)SEQ ID NO: 28 and (iii) an N-terminus truncated fragments of a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 29 andSEQ ID NO: 32.

In one embodiment, the period of time is selected from the groupconsisting of (i) 1-3 days; (ii) 3-5 days; (iii) 5-7 days; (iv) 7-9days; (v) 9-11 days; (vi) 11-13 days; (vii) 13-15 days; (viii) 2-3weeks; (ix) 3-4 weeks; (x) 4-5 weeks; (xi) 5-7 weeks; (xii) 7-10 weeks;(xii) 2-3 months and (xiii) 3-5 months.

In another embodiment, the fragments are selected from the groupconsisting of (i) SEQ ID NO: 16 and (ii) SEQ ID NO: 23.

In another embodiment, the plant is selected from the group consistingof: (i) potato, (ii) tomato, (iii) lettuce and (iv) pepper.

In another embodiment, the plant possesses one or more additional traitsselected from the group consisting of: (i) low reducing sugar, (ii) lowfree asparagines, (iii) low bruising, (iv) reduced cold-inducedsweetening, (v) low acrylamide, (vi) resistance to Phytophthora, (vii)reduced starch phosphate level and (viii) increased antioxidant.

In another embodiment, the plant's endogenous cIF4E gene iddownregulated or inhibited. For instance, the amount of the RNAtranscript of the native eIF4E gene or the protein product of the nativeeIF4E gene may be reduced by 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%or 100%.

In another embodiment, the transformed plant possesses one or moreadditional traits selected from the group consisting of: (i) lowreducing sugar, (ii) low free asparagines, (iii) low bruising, (iv)reduced cold-induced sweetening, (v) low acrylamide, (vi) resistance toPhytophthora, (vii) reduced starch phosphate level and (viii) increasedantioxidant.

Another aspect of the present technology is an isolated polynucleotide,comprising a sequence that (A) encodes a protein with at least 80%identity to at least 15 contiguous amino acids of the eIF4E proteinsequence SEQ ID NO: 6 and comprises at least two amino acidssubstitutions selected from the group consisting of (i) T44A, (ii) S68N,(iii) I70T, (iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii) A130S,(ix) S172N and (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO: 6, or (i) T10M, (ii) A23G, (iii)Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ ID NO: 6 (mutated sequences disclosedas SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84, respectively); or (B) encodes the proteincomprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 (C) encodes anN-terminus truncated fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4,; or (D)encodes a protein comprising the sequence SEQ ID NO: 27 or SEQ ID NO:28; or (E) encodes an N-terminus truncated fragment of a sequence of SEQID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 29 or SEQ ID NO: 32; wherein the polynucleotideconfers full or partial resistance to PVY disease when it is expressedin the plant.

The S68N substitution is a neutral-to-neutral amino acid change at theposition represented by X₁ of SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38. The presenttechnology contemplates that S68 may be changed to other neutral aminoacids, such as alanine and cysteine.

The S68N substitution is a neutral-to-neutral amino acid change at theposition represented by X₁ of SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38. The presenttechnology contemplates that S68 may be changed to other neutral aminoacids, such as alanine and cysteine.

The I70T substitution is a neutral-to-neutral amino acid change at theposition represented by X₃ of SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38. The presenttechnology contemplates that 170 may be changed to other neutral aminoacids, such as valine and leucine.

The K72R substitution is a neutral-to-neutral amino acid change at theposition represented by position 6 of SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38. The presenttechnology contemplates that K72 may be changed to other positive aminoacids, such as histidine and lysine.

The A77D substitution is a neutral-to-negative amino acid change at theposition represented by position 11 of SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38. The presenttechnology contemplates that A77 may be changed to other negative aminoacids, such as glutamic acid and aspartic acid.

In one embodiment, the polynucleotide encodes a protein that shares atleast about 99%, 98%, 97%, 96%, 95%, 94%, 93%, 92%, 91%, 90%, 89%, 88%,87%, 86%, 85%, 84%, 83%, 82%, 81% or 80% sequence identity with SEQ IDNOs: 2, 4 or 6, or with a partial sequence fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4or 6. In this respect, a partial sequence fragment of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4or 6 means a peptide fragment that comprises more than 2 contiguousamino acids and which also functions to confer resistance to PVY virusupon a plant. Accordingly, in one embodiment, a partial sequencefragment of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4 or 6 confers PVY resistance to a plant andcomprises 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29,30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65,66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83,84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100,101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114,115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128,129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142,143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156,157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170,171, 172, 173, 174, 175, I76, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184,185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198,199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212,213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226,227, 228, 229, 230 or 231 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4 or6.

In another embodiment, the polynucleotide encodes an N-terminustruncated fragment of any sequence disclosed herein that confers PVYresistance to a plant, wherein the fragment comprises (i) residues40-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6, or (ii) residues 50-231 of SEQ ID NO:2, 4, or 6, or (iii) residues 51-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6, or (iv)residues 52-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6, or (v) residues 53-231 of SEQID NO: 2, 4, or 6; or (vi) residues 54-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6, or(vii) residues 55-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6, or (viii) residues60-231 of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, or 6.

In another embodiment, a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 comprises one or moreof the following combinations of amino acids: (N68, T70), (N68, R72),(N68, I76), (N68, D77), (N68, I128), (N68, S130), (N68, N172), (N68,V175), (T70, N68), (T70, R72), (T70, I76), (T70, D77), (T70, I128),(T70, S130), (T70, N172), (T70, V175), (R72, N68), (R72, T70), (R72,I76), (R72, D77), (R72, I128), (R72, S130), (R72, N172), (R72, V175),(I76, N68), (I76, T70), (I76, R72), (I76, D77), (I76, I128), (I76,S130), (I76, N172), (I76, V175), (D77, N68), (D77, T70), (D77, R72),(D77, I76), (D77, I128), (D77, S130), (D77, N172), (D77, V175), (I128,N68), (I128, T70), (I128, R72), (I128, I76), (I128, D77), (I128, S 130),(I128, N172), (I128, V175), (S130, N68), (S130, T70), (S130, R72),(S130, I76), (S130, D77), (S130, I128), (S130, N172), (S130, V175),(N172, N68), (N172, T70), (N172, R72), (N172, I76), (N172, D77), (N172,I128), (N172, S130), (N172, V175), (V175, N68), (V175, T70), (V175,R72), (V175, I76), (V175, D77), (V175, I128), (V175, S130) and (V175,N172). This numbering scheme reflects the position of the denotedresidue within SEQ ID NO: 2. Thus, “N68” refers to asparagine atposition 68 of SEQ ID NO: 2; “T70” indicates residue threonine atposition 70 of SEQ ID NO: 2, and so on. In one embodiment, a partialsequence fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 is a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 thatcontains one or more of the following amino acids (i) N68, (ii) T70,(iii) R72, (iv) I76, (v) D77, (vi) I128, (vii) S130, (viii) N172 and(ix) V175, of SEQ ID NO:2.

In another embodiment, a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 4 comprises one or moreof the following combinations of amino acids: (T10, A23), (T10, Y57),(T10, N99Y), (T10, S140), (A23, Y57), (A23, N99Y), (A23, S 140), (Y57,N99Y), (Y57, S 140), (N99Y, S 140). This numbering scheme reflects theposition of the denoted residue within SEQ ID NO: 4. Thus, “T10” refersto threonine at position 10 of SEQ ID NO: 4; “A23” indicates residuealanine at position 23 of SEQ ID NO: 4, and so on. In one embodiment, apartial sequence fragment of SEQ ID NO: 4 is a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 4that contains one or more of the following amino acids (i) T10, (ii)A23, (iii) Y47, (iv) N99 and (v) S140 of SEQ ID NO: 4.

In another embodiment, a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 6 comprises one or moreof the following combinations of amino acid substitutions of SEQ ID NO:6: (S68N, I70T), (S68N, K72R), (S68N, T76I), (S68N, A77D), (S68N,V128I), (S68N, A130S), (S68N, S172N), (S68N, S175V), (I70T, S68N),(I70T, K72R), (I70T, T76I), (I70T, A77D), (I70T, V128I), (I70T, A130S),(I70T, S172N), (I70T, S175V), (K72R, S68N), (K72R, I70T), (K72R, T76I),(K72R, A77D), (K72R, V128I), (K72R, A130S), (K72R, S172N), (K72R,S175V), (T76I, S68N), (T76I, I70T), (T76I, K72R), (T76I, A77D), (T76I,V128I), (T76I, A130S), (T76I, S172N), (T76I, S175V), (A77D, S68N),(A77D, I70T), (A77D, K72R), (A77D, T76I), (A77D, V128I), (A77D, A130S),(A77D, S172N), (A77D, S175V), (V128I, S68N), (V128I, I70T), (V128I,K72R), (V128I, T76I), (V128I, A77D), (V128I, A130S), (V128I, S172N),(V128I, S175V), (A130S, S68N), (A130S, I70T), (A130S, K72R), (A130S,T76I), (A130S, A77D), (A130S, V128I), (A130S, S172N), (A130S, S175V),(S172N, S68N), (S172N, I70T), (S172N, K72R), (S172N, T76I), (S172N,A77D), (S172N, V128I), (S172N, A130S), (S172N, S175V), (S175V, S68N),(S175V, I70T), (S175V, K72R), (S175V, T76I), (S175V, A77D), (S175V,V128I), (S175V, A130S) and (S175V, S172N).

In another embodiment, a fragment of SEQ ID NO: 6 comprises one or moreof the following combinations of amino acid substitutions of SEQ ID NO:6: (T10M, A23G), (T10M, Y47F), (T10M, N99Y), (T10M, L140P), (A23G,Y47F), (A23G, N99Y), (A23G, L140P), (Y47F, N99Y), (Y47F, L140P) and(N99Y, L140P).

In one embodiment, the fragments are selected from the group consistingof (i) SEQ ID NO: 20, (ii) SEQ ID NO: 21, (iii) SEQ ID NO: 16 and (iv)SEQ ID NO: 23.

Another aspect of the present technology is a vector, comprising apolynucleotide which comprises a sequence that (A) encodes a proteinwith at least 80% identity to at least 15 contiguous amino acids of theeIF4E protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 6 and comprises at least two aminoacids substitutions selected from the group consisting of (i) T44A, (ii)S68N, (iii) I70T, (iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii)A130S, (ix) S172N and (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO: 6, or (i) T10M, (ii) A23G,(iii) Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ ID NO: 6 (mutated sequencesdisclosed as SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84, respectively); or (B) encodes theprotein comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 (C)encodes an N-terminus truncated fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO:4,; or (D) encodes a protein comprising the sequence SEQ ID NO: 27 orSEQ ID NO: 28; or (E) encodes an N-terminus truncated fragment of asequence of SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 29 or SEQ ID NO: 32; wherein thepolynucleotide confers full or partial resistance to PVY disease when itis expressed in the plant.

In one embodiment, the polynucleotide is located in an Agrobacteriumtransfer-DNA.

In another embodiment, the Agrobacterium transfer-DNA comprisesborder-like sequences that are not 100% identical to any AgrobacteriumT-DNA border sequences.

Another aspect of the present technology is a plant which compriseswithin its genome, or otherwise expresses, a polynucleotide whichcomprises a sequence that (A) encodes a protein with at least 80%identity to at least 15 contiguous amino acids of the eIF4E proteinsequence SEQ ID NO: 6 and comprises at least two amino acidssubstitutions selected from the group consisting of (i) T44A, (ii) S68N,(iii) I70T, (iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii) A130S,(ix) S172N and (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO: 6, or (i) T10M, (ii) A23G, (iii)Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ ID NO: 6 (mutated sequences disclosedas SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84, respectively); or (B) encodes the proteincomprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 (C) encodes anN-terminus truncated fragment of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4,; or (D)encodes a protein comprising the sequence SEQ ID NO: 27 or SEQ ID NO:28; or (E) encodes an N-terminus truncated fragment of a sequence of SEQID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 29 or SEQ ID NO: 32; wherein the polynucleotideconfers full or partial resistance to PVY disease when it is expressedin the plant

In one embodiment, the plant is selected from the group consisting of:(i) potato, (ii) tomato, (iii) lettuce and (iv) pepper.

Another embodiment is a tuber, leaf or fruit grown from the plant.

In another embodiment, the plant possesses one or more additional traitsselected from the group consisting of: (i) low reducing sugar, (ii) lowfree asparagines, (iii) low bruising, (iv) reduced cold-inducedsweetening, (v) low acrylamide, (vi) resistance to Phytophthora, (vii)reduced starch phosphate level and (viii) increased antioxidant.

Another aspect of the present technology is a method of making a foodproduct, comprising: (1) transforming a plant with the polynucleotide ofclaim 13; (2) growing the transformed plant and obtaining a tuber,fruit, or leaf from the plant; and (3) either (i) directly using thetuber, fruit, or leaf as a food product or (ii) processing the tuber,fruit, or leaf into a food product.

In one embodiment, the expression of the plant's endogenous eIF4E geneis downregulated or inhibited. For instance, the amount of the RNAtranscript of the native eIF4E gene or the protein product of the nativeeIF4E gene may be reduced by 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%or 100%.

In another embodiment, substantially all cells of the transformed plantexpress the polynucleotide.

In another embodiment, at least 5 leaves of the transformed plantexpress the polynucleotide.

In another embodiment, at least 50% of the cells of the transformedplant express the polynucleotide.

In another embodiment, the polynucleotide is expressed for at least oneweek.

Another aspect of the present technology is a food product made from amethod of making a food product, comprising: (1) transforming a plantwith the polynucleotide of claim 13; (2) growing the transformed plantand obtaining a tuber, fruit, or leaf from the plant; and (3) either (i)directly using the tuber, fruit, or leaf as a food product or (ii)processing the tuber, fruit, or leaf into a food product.

Another aspect of the present technology is a food product, comprising aplant cell obtained from a plant comprising within its genome, orotherwise expressing, a polynucleotide which comprises a sequence that(A) encodes a protein with at least 80% identity to at least 15contiguous amino acids of the eIF4E protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 6 andcomprises at least two amino acids substitutions selected from the groupconsisting of (i) T44A, (ii) S68N, (iii) I70T, (iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi)A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii) A130S, (ix) S172N and (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO:6, or (i) T10M, (ii) A23G, (iii) Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ IDNO: 6 (mutated sequences disclosed as SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84,respectively); or (B) encodes the protein comprising the sequence of SEQID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 (C) encodes an N-terminus truncated fragment ofSEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4,; or (D) encodes a protein comprising thesequence SEQ ID NO: 27 or SEQ ID NO: 28; or (E) encodes an N-terminustruncated fragment of a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 27, SEQ ID NO: 29 or SEQID NO: 32; wherein the polynucleotide confers full or partial resistanceto PVY disease when it is expressed in the plant.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1: Alignment of eIF4E proteins (SEQ ID NOS 54-73, respectively, inorder of appearance) associated with recessive resistance. Mutationsobserved in each resistant allele are underlined.

FIG. 2: Alignment of the proteins (SEQ ID NOS 74-77, respectively, inorder of appearance) encoded by eIF4E from potato (S. tuberosum) andsegregating individuals from accessions of the wild potato species S.etuberosum, S. chacoense, and S. demissum. Pwp1 was isolated from S.etuberosum accession PI245939, S. chacoense accessions PI175446 andPI175419, and S. demissum accession PI175423. Pwp2 was isolated from S.stoloniferum accessions PI195195 and PI275244. Polymorphisms between twowild type alleles are underlined and mutations on wild potato allelewere also underlined.

FIG. 3: Alignment of pwp1 and pwp2 with previously characterized eIF4Eproteins associated with recessive resistance (SEQ ID NOS 78-79, 54-64,66-72, and 80, respectively, in order of appearance). Mutations on pwp1and pwp2 are underlined.

FIG. 4: The vpg binding ability of pwp1, pwp2 and SteIF4EA77D proteinsin the yeast two hybrid system. (Top panels) pwp1 and pwp2 bindingability: (Left) Yeast transformants on SD (-Leu, -Tip) plate. (Right)Yeast transformants on SD (-Leu, -Trp, -His) plate. Bait plasmid PBD wasused to express vpg from PVY strain NTN. Prey plasmid PAD was used toexpress wild type potato EIF4E and wild potato pwp1 and pwp2. 1-4:Single vector transformants (1, PBD-vpg; 2, PAD-wt EIF4E; 3, PAD-pwp1;4, PAD-pwp2). 5-6: double-vector co-transformants (5, PBD-vpg+PAD-wtEIF4E; 6, PBD-vpg+PAD-pwp1; 7, PBD-vpg+PAD-pwp2). Colonies from eachco-transformation grow on -leucine, -typtophone medium indicatedexistence of both constructs. Only PBD-VPg/PAD-WTEIF4E co-transformantsgrow on -leucine, -trptophone, -histidine plates indicated only wtEIF4Ebut not pwp1 and pwp2 interacts with VPg. (Bottom panel) SteIF4EA77Dbinding ability. Two independent yeast transformants were streaked on SD(-Leu, -Trp, -His) plate. 1 and 4 (PAD::SteIF4EA77D and PBD::VPg), 2 and5 (PAD::SteIF4E and PBD::VPg), 3 and 6 (PAD::SteIF4EA77D).PBD-VPg/PAD-SteIF4EA77D co-transformants grow on -leucine, -trptophone,-histidine plates indicated only A77D mutation did not abolish the VPgbinding ability of SteIF4E protein.

FIG. 5: RNA gel blot analysis of pSIM1567 plants. RNA was isolated fromleaf tissues of wild type Burbank (wt), empty vector control (vc) andtransgenic pSIM1567 (1-25) plants, run on the gel, transferred to nylonmembrane and hybridized with Dig-labeled potato EIF4E probe according tostandard protocol. EB-stained ribosome RNA was used as loading control.

FIG. 6: All-native transfer DNA for PVY control.

FIG. 7: Transcript levels of Fpvr in leaves of pSIM1719 lines. RBc isthe Russet Burbank control and 401 c is the empty vector control.

FIG. 8: RNA gel blot analysis of selected pSIM1569 plants. RNA wasisolated from leaf tissues of wild type Burbank (wt), empty vectorcontrol (401) and transgenic pSIM1569 (9, 16, 18, 23, 25) plants, run onthe gel, transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with Dig-labeledpotato EIF4E probe according to standard protocol. EB-stained ribosomeRNA was used as loading control.

FIG. 9: RNA gel blot analysis of selected pSIM1588 (modified peppereIF4E 1, mpe1, overexpression) plants. RNA was isolated from leaftissues of wild type Burbank (wt), empty vector control (401) andtransgenic pSIM1588 (2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20 and 23) plants, runon the gel, transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized withDig-labeled pepper eIF4E probe according to standard protocol.EB-stained ribosome RNA was used as loading control. Lines 7, 9, 13, 19and 20 are resistant to PVY two weeks after infection, and lines 9 and13 are resistant to PVY four weeks after infection. Lines 2, 5, 12, 18,23 are susceptible.

FIG. 10: RNA gel blot analysis of selected pSIM1723 (modified peppereIF4E 2, mpe2, overexpression) plants. RNA was isolated from leaftissues of wild type Burbank (wt), empty vector control (401) andtransgenic pSIM1723 (6, 7, 9, 10, 15, 19, 20 and 22) plants, run on thegel, transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with Dig-labeledpepper eIF4E probe according to standard protocol. EB-stained ribosomeRNA was used as loading control. Lines 9 and 20 are resistant to PVY twoweeks after infection, line 20 is resistant to PVY four weeks afterinfection and lines 6, 7, 10, 15, 19 and 22 are susceptible.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs. Generally, the nomenclatureused herein, and the laboratory procedures in cell culture, moleculargenetics, and nucleic acid chemistry and hybridization described herein,are those well known and commonly employed in the art. Standardtechniques are used for recombinant nucleic acid methods, polynucleotidesynthesis, microbial culture, cell culture, tissue culture,transformation, transfection, transduction, analytical chemistry,organic synthetic chemistry, chemical syntheses, chemical analysis, andpharmaceutical formulation and delivery. Generally, enzymatic reactionsand purification and/or isolation steps are performed according to themanufacturers' specifications. The techniques and procedures aregenerally performed according to conventional methodology disclosed, forexample, in “Molecular cloning a laboratory manual”, 2d ed., Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989), and Currentprotocols in molecular biology, John Wiley & Sons, Baltimore, Md.(1989).

“Agrobacterium” means any Agrobacteria that are used for transformingplant cells, are disarmed and virulent derivatives of, usually,Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes that contain avector. The vector typically contains a desired polynucleotide that islocated between the borders of a T-DNA or, according to the presentinvention, between the border-like sequences of a “plant-DNA” (“P-DNA”),see definition below, which border (like) sequences are capable oftransferring the desired polynucleotide into a plant genome. Examples ofAgrobacteria include but are not limited to Agrobacterium sp., Rhizobiumsp., Phyllobacterium sp., SinoRhizobium sp., and MesoRhizobium sp.

“Amino acid sequence” includes an oligopeptide, peptide, polypeptide, orprotein and fragments thereof, that are isolated from, native to, ornaturally occurring in a plant, or are synthetically made but comprisethe nucleic acid sequence of the endogenous counterpart.

“Artificially manipulated” means to move, arrange, operate or control bythe hands or by mechanical means or recombinant means, such as bygenetic engineering techniques, a plant or plant cell, so as to producea plant or plant cell that has a different biological, biochemical,morphological, or physiological phenotype and/or genotype in comparisonto unmanipulated, naturally-occurring counterpart.

“Asexual propagation” means producing progeny by generating an entireplant from leaf cuttings, stem cuttings, root cuttings, tuber eyes,stolons, single plant cells protoplasts, callus and the like, that doesnot involve fusion of gametes.

“Backbone” means the nucleic acid sequence of a vector or plasmidoutside of a particular cassette or expression cassette or constructthat is to be integrated into a plant genome. For example, in the caseof an Agrobacterium transfer plasmid, the backbone is the entirety ofthe plasmid that excludes the particular T-DNA or P-DNA sequence withinwhich is positioned the desired nucleic acid for introduction and/orintegration into the plant genome. Accordingly, the backbone of such aplasmid may contain other expression cassettes, such as those forexpressing a selectable marker, but which are not intended to betransferred into the plant genome. Such cassettes and constructs whichare not intended to be transferred into the plant genome may thereforebe considered to constitute part of the plasmid or vector “backbone.”

“Bacterium-mediated plant transformation” means the modification of aplant by infecting either that plant or an explant or cell derived fromthat plant with a bacterium selected of the group consisting ofAgrobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Phyllobacterium sp., SinoRhizohiumsp., and MesoRhizohium sp. to transfer at least part of a plasmid thatreplicates in that bacterium to the nuclei of individual plant cells forsubsequent stable integration into the genome of that plant cell.

“Binary plasmid” or “Binary construct” means a plasmid that can bemaintained in both E. coli and A. tumefaciens, and contains T-DNA rightand left borders that are flanked by at least 10 base pairs of DNA thatflank these elements in Agrobacterium Ti or Ri plasmids. “Border andBorder-like sequences” are Agrobacterium-derived, or plant-derivedsequences, that facilitate cleavage of a transformation vector T-DNA orP-DNA. Typically, a left border sequence and a right border sequenceflank a T-DNA or P-DNA and they both function as recognition sites forvirD2-catalyzed nicking reactions. Such activity releases nucleic acidthat is positioned between such borders. See Table 1 below for examplesof border sequences.

TABLE 1 “Border” and “Border-Like” sequences Agrobacterium T-DNA bordersTGACAGGATATATTGGCGGGTAAAC Agrobacterium nopaline strains (RB)(SEQ ID NO. 39) TGGCAGGATATATTGTGGTGTAAACAgrobacterium nopaline strains (LB) (SEQ ID NO. 40)TGGCAGGATATATACCGTTGTAATT Agrobacterium octopine strains (RB)(SEQ ID NO. 41) CGGCAGGATATATTCAATTGTAATTAgrobacterium octopine strains (LB) (SEQ ID NO. 42)TGGTAGGATATATACCGTTGTAATT LB mutant (SEQ ID NO. 43)TGGCAGGATATATGGTACTGTAATT LB mutant (SEQ ID NO. 44)YGRYAGGATATATWSNVBKGTAAWY Border motif (SEQ ID NO. 45)Border-like sequences CGGCAGGATATATCCTGATGTAAAT R. leguminosarum(SEQ ID NO. 46) TGGCAGGAGTTATTCGAGGGTAAAC T. tengcongensis(SEQ ID NO. 47) TGACAGGATATATCGTGATGTCAAC Arabidopsis thaliana(SEQ ID NO. 48) GGGAAGTACATATTGGCGGGTAAAC A. thaliana CHR1v07142002(SEQ ID NO. 49) TTACAGGATATATTAATATGTATGA Oryza sativa AC078894(SEQ ID NO. 50) TAACATGATATATTCCCTTGTAAAT Homo sapiens clone HQ0089(SEQ ID NO. 51) TGACAGGATATATGGTAATGTAAAC potato (left border sequence)*(SEQ ID NO. 52) TGGCAGGATATATACCGATGTAAACpotato (right border sequence)* (SEQ ID NO. 53) Y = C or T; R = A or G;K = G or T; M = A or C; W = A or T; S = C or G; V = A, C, or G; B = C,G, or T. The accession numbers for the border-like sequences are: Oryzasativa chromosome 10 BAC OSJNBa0096G08 genomic sequence (AC078894.11);Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 3 (NM_114337.1); Arabidopsis thalianachromosome 1 (NM_105664.1); T. tengcongensis strain MB4T, section 118 of244 of the complete genome (AE013091.1); Homo sapiens clone HQ0089(AF090888.1); Rhizobium Clone: rhiz98e12.qlk. *potato left and rightborder sequences were obtained and isolated according to thepresently-described inventive methods.

The released nucleic acid, complexed with virD2 and virE2, is targetedto plant cell nuclei where the nucleic acid is often integrated into thegenome of the plant cell. Usually, two border sequences, a left-borderand a right-border, are used to integrate a nucleotide sequence that islocated between them into another nucleotide sequence. It is alsopossible to use only one border, or more than two borders, to accomplishintegration of a desired nucleic acid in such fashion.

A “native P-DNA border sequence” is about 99%, 98%, 97%, 96%, 95%, 94%,93%, 92%, 91%, 90%, 89%, 88%, 87%, 86%, 85%, 84%, 83%, 82%, 81%, 80%,79%, 78%, 77%, 76%, 75%, 74%, 73%, 72%, 71%, 70%, 69%, 68%, 67%, 66%,65%, 64%, 63%, 62%, 61%, 60%, 59%, 58%, 57%, 56%, 55%, 54%, 53%, 52%,51% or 50% similar in nucleotide sequence, but not identical to, to anAgrobacterium T-DNA border sequence. A border-like sequence can,therefore, be isolated from a plant genome and be modified or mutated tochange the efficiency by which they are capable of integrating anucleotide sequence into another nucleotide sequence. Otherpolynucleotide sequences may be added to or incorporated within aborder-like sequence of the present invention. Thus, a P-DNA left borderor a P-DNA right border may be modified so as to possess 5′- and3′-multiple cloning sites, or additional restriction sites. A P-DNAborder sequence may be modified to increase the likelihood that backboneDNA from the accompanying vector is not integrated into the plantgenome.

A “border-like sequence” is isolated from the selected plant speciesthat is to be modified, or from a plant that is sexually-compatible withthe plant species to be modified, and functions like the bordersequences of Agrobacterium. That is, a border-like sequence of thepresent invention promotes and facilitates the integration of apolynucleotide to which it is linked. A plant-DNA, i.e., P-DNA, of thepresent invention preferably contains border-like sequences. Aborder-like sequence may comprise the 5′-YGRYAGGATATATWSNVBKGTAAWY-3′(SEQ ID NO: 34) consensus sequence as described in U.S. Pat. No.7,619,138, wherein Y is C or T; R is A or G; K is G or T; M is A or C; Wis A or T; S is C or G; V is A, C, or G; and B is C, G, or T. Aborder-like sequence from potato (SEQ ID NO: 33) is described, forinstance, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,880,057.

A border-like sequence of a P-DNA is between 5-100 bp in length, 10-80bp in length, 15-75 bp in length, 15-60 bp in length, 15-50 bp inlength, 15-40 bp in length, 15-30 bp in length, 16-30 bp in length,20-30 bp in length, 21-30 bp in length, 22-30 bp in length, 23-30 bp inlength, 24-30 bp in length, 25-30 bp in length, or 26-30 bp in length.

“Cassette” is a DNA sequence that may comprise various genetic elements.Accordingly, any one of the expression cassettes described herein may beinserted into a transfer-DNA that is delimited by such P-DNA bordersequences, which are capable of integrating the cassette into anothernucleic acid, such as a plant genome or plant chromosome. Accordingly,an Agrobacterium plasmid, which contains an expression cassettedescribed herein that does not comprise a DNA region that is involved in3-end formation and polyadenylation of an RNA transcript, may be stablyintegrated into the genome of a plant via Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation. The progeny of that transformed plant, therefore, willcontinue to express the transcripts associated with the expressioncassette.

“Callus formation”: typically, young roots, stems, buds, and germinatingseedlings are a few of the sources of plant tissue that can be used toinduce callus formation. Callus formation is controlled by growthregulating substances present in tissue culture medium, such as auxinsand cytokinins. The specific substances, and concentrations of thosesubstances, that induce callus formation varies between plant species.Occasionally, different sources of explants require different culturingconditions, even if obtained from the same plant or species.Accordingly, a cocktail of various growth substances can be added totissue culture medium in order to induce callus formation from a varietyof plant species that are incubated on such media. Other factors, suchas the amount of light, temperature, and humidity, for instance, areimportant in establishing a callus. Once established, callus culturescan be used to obtain protoplasts, or study somatic embryogenesis,organogenesis, and secondary metabolite production.

“Cleavage site” is a DNA sequence that is structurally different butfunctionally similar to T-DNA borders. A cleavage site comprises asequence that is nicked when exposed to an enzyme involved inbacterium-mediated plant transformation. It can represent a syntheticsequence that may not be present in the genome of a living organism orit can represent a sequence from a living organism such as a plant,animal, fungus, or bacterium.

“Confer” means to invest with a property or characteristic, such as, inthe present technology, to impart or give a particular trait orcharacteristic or property to a plant or plant cell. Thus, a particularresistance gene may confer viral resistance to a plant that is exposedto the particular virus. The resistance gene may also confer the abilityof a plant cell to express an RNA transcript or protein, which by itselfor in aggregate with transcripts and resistance proteins expressed fromother cells, makes the plant, a part of the plant, or progeny of theplant, resistant to the virus. Accordingly, in the context ofgenetically engineered plants, a gene or polynucleotide that isintegrated into the plant genome, or which is expressed in the plantcell but not integrated, may be said to “confer” resistance upon theplant or a part thereof to exposure to one or more viruses. To conferresistance, the gene may be expressed stably or transiently. Accordingto the present invention, resistance to PVY may be conferred to atransformed plant over a period of time. For instance, a transformedcultivated plant of the present invention may be resistant to PVY virusfor 1-5 days, 1 week, 2-4 weeks, 1 month, 2-12 months, 1 year, 2-5years, 5-10 years, 10-50 years or 50-100 years, or longer.

The term “constitutive” when used in conjunction with a promoter meansthat the promoter dictates constant active expression of the genecontrolled by the promoter. The term “near-constitutive”, when used inconjunction with a promoter, means that the promoter does not have thesame activities across different tissue types. Two examples ofnear-constitutive in plants are 35S promoter and Pat promoter.

A “cultivated” plant is one grown or tended to by, or under the controlof, human care, attention, and husbandry. With respect to potato plants,Solanum tuberosum ssp. tuberosum is an example of one of the most widelycultivated potato varieties, although there are thousands of potatovarieties worldwide. Modem varieties of Solanum tuberosum are the mostwidely cultivated. There are two major subspecies of Solanum tuberosum:andigena, or Andean; and tuberosum, or Chilean. In general, well-knowncultivated varieties include, but are not limited to, russets, reds,whites, yellows (also called Yukons) and purples. Popular varieties,also known as cultivars, include: Adirondack Blue, Adirondack Red,Agata, Almond, Amandine, Anya, Arran Victory, Atlantic, Bamberg, Bellede Fontenay, BF-15, Bildtstar, Bintje, Blue Congo, Bonnotte, Cabritas,Camota, Chelina, Chiloé, Cielo, Clavela Blanca, Désirée, Fianna,Fingerling, Flava, Golden Wonder, Innovator, Jersey Royal, Kerr's Pink,Kestrel, King Edward, Kipfler, Lady Balfour, Linda, Marfona, MarisPiper, Marquis, Nicola, Pachacoña, Pink Eye, Pink Fir Apple, Primura,Ratte, Red Norland, Red Pontiac, Rooster, Russet Burbank, RussetNorkotah, Selma, Shepody, Sieglinde, Sirco, Spunta, Stobrawa, Vivaldi,Vitelotte, Yellow Finn, and Yukon Gold. Any of these cultivatedvarieties may be modified as disclosed herein to express a pwp1 gene forconferring resistance upon the variety to PVY virus. A wild potato plantis not a cultivated potato plant variety. See the definition elsewhereherein for more details.

The term “delayed disease progression” or “delayed disease symptoms” or“to resist the onset of one or more symptoms of PVY disease,” or“partial resistance” in the context of the present invention means that,after being infected with the PVY virus, one or more symptoms of PVYdisease do not appear for a period of time in a plant transformed asdisclosed herein to express a PVY-resistance polynucleotide . Forexample, the transformed plant may display the disease symptom 1-3 days,3-5 days, 5-7 days, 7-9 days, 9-11 days, 11-13 days, 13-15 days, 2-3weeks, 3-4 weeks, 4-5 weeks, 5-7 weeks, 7-10 weeks, 2-3 months and 3-5months later than the untransformed plant. Transformed plants withdelayed disease progression typically carry the PVY virus protein uponinfection. See Example 5. The PVY virus protein can be detected viaELISA assay. The length of the symptom delay varies.

PVY disease “symptoms” means a variety of reactions by the plant thatmay occur upon a PVY virus infection. These “symptoms” include, but arenot limited to, rapid death of the infected area and area surroundingthe infection, distorted and brittle leaves, wrinkled and rough leaves,leaf curling, mild mottling, some production reduction and the potatotuber necrotic ringspot disease. The present invention contemplates adelay in the appearance or onset of any of these symptoms and thephrases described above, e.g., “delayed disease progression,” “delayeddisease symptoms,” “to resist the onset of one or more symptoms of PVYdisease,” and “partial resistance,” are meant to connote that delay inPVY symptom appearance.

To “downregulate” or “inhibit” refers to a process by which the quantityof a cellular component, such as RNA or protein, is decreased inresponse to an external variable. Thus, for instance, in the context ofgene silencing, it is possible to use sense, antisense, co-suppression,double-stranded RNA, hairpin RNA, siRNA, or to rely upon other genesilencing mechanisms, such as RNAi, to downregulate, inhibit, or silencethe expression of an endogenous gene. This may mean that a consequenceof gene silencing is the reduction in levels of RNA transcripts normallyexpressed from the targeted gene, or it may mean there is a reduction inthe encoded and translated protein levels compared a non-silenced plantcell.

A “gene” is a segment of a DNA molecule that contains all theinformation required for synthesis of a product, polypeptide chain orRNA molecule that includes both coding and non-coding sequences. Forinstance, a gene may comprise different genetic elements such asdiscreet nucleotide sequences that include but are not limited to apromoter, terminator, intron, enhancer, spacer, 5′-untranslated region,3′-untranslated region, or recombinase recognition site.

To “genetically modify” an organism can mean introducing a nucleic acidinto a cell or genome of a plant or organism. The introduced nucleicacid may be DNA or RNA. The DNA or RNA may be single-stranded ordouble-stranded. The introduced nucleic acid may be stably integratedinto a genome or chromosomal material, or may exist within the cellextrachromosomally.

“Isolated” refers to any nucleic acid or compound that is physicallyseparated from its normal, native environment, and is therefore markedlydifferent from its endogenous counterpart. The isolated material may bemaintained in a suitable solution containing, for instance, a solvent, abuffer, an ion, or other component, and may be in purified, orunpurified, form.

“Native,” when used to describe a gene or a genetic element, means thatthe gene or genetic element naturally exists in, originates from, orbelongs to the genome of a plant that is to be transformed. In the samevein, the term “endogenous” also can be used to identify a particularnucleic acid, e.g., DNA or RNA, or a protein as “native” to a plant.Endogenous means an element that originates within the organism. Thus,any nucleic acid, gene, polynucleotide, DNA, RNA, mRNA, or cDNA moleculethat is isolated either from the genome of a plant or plant species thatis to be transformed or is isolated from a plant or species that issexually compatible or interfertile with the plant species that is to betransformed, is “native” to, i.e., indigenous to, the plant species. Inother words, a native genetic element represents all genetic materialthat is accessible to plant breeders for the improvement of plantsthrough classical plant breeding. Any variants of a native nucleic acidalso are considered “native” in accordance with the present invention.In this respect, a “native” nucleic acid may also be isolated from aplant or sexually compatible species thereof and modified or mutated sothat the resultant variant is greater than or equal to 99%, 98%, 97%,96%, 95%, 94%, 93%, 92%, 91%, 90%, 89%, 88%, 87%, 86%, 85%, 84%, 83%,82%, 81%, 80%, 79%, 78%, 77%, 76%, 75%, 74%, 73%, 72%, 71%, 70%, 69%,68%, 67%, 66%, 65%, 64%, 63%, 62%, 61%, or 60% similar in nucleotidesequence to the unmodified, native nucleic acid isolated from a plant. Anative nucleic acid variant may also be less than about 60%, less thanabout 55%, or less than about 50% similar in nucleotide sequence.

A “native” nucleic acid isolated from a plant may also encode a variantof the naturally occurring protein product transcribed and translatedfrom that nucleic acid. Thus, a native nucleic acid may encode a proteinthat is greater than or equal to 99%, 98%, 97%, 96%, 95%, 94%, 93%, 92%,91%, 90%, 89%, 88%, 87%, 86%, 85%, 84%, 83%, 82%, 81%, 80%, 79%, 78%,77%, 76%, 75%, 74%, 73%, 72%, 71%, 70%, 69%, 68%, 67%, 66%, 65%, 64%,63%, 62%, 61%, 60% similar in amino acid sequence to the unmodified,native protein expressed in the plant from which the nucleic acid wasisolated.

“Naturally occurring nucleic acid” means that the nucleic acid is foundwithin the genome of a selected plant species and may be a DNA moleculeor an RNA molecule. The sequence of a restriction site that is normallypresent in the genome of a plant species can be engineered into anexogenous DNA molecule, such as a vector or oligonucleotide, even thoughthat restriction site was not physically isolated from that genome.Thus, the present invention permits the synthetic creation of anucleotide sequence, such as a restriction enzyme recognition sequence,so long as that sequence is naturally occurring in the genome of theselected plant species or in a plant that is sexually compatible withthe selected plant species that is to be transformed.

Public concerns were addressed through development of an all-nativeapproach to making genetically engineered plants, as disclosed byRommens et al. in New Zealand Patent 535,395, U.S. Pat. No. 7,250,554,U.S. Pat. No. 7,534,934, and WO2005/004585, which are all incorporatedherein by reference. Rommens et al. teach the identification andisolation of genetic elements from plants that can be used forbacterium-mediated plant transformation. Thus, Rommens teaches that aplant-derived transfer-DNA (“P-DNA”), for instance, can be isolated froma plant genome and used in place of an Agrobacterium T-DNA togenetically engineer plants.

“N-terminus” means the start of a protein or polypeptide terminated byan amino acid with a free amine group (—NH₂). Each amino acid has acarboxyl group and an amine group, and amino acids link to one anotherto form a chain by a dehydration reaction by joining the amine group ofone amino acid to the carboxyl group of the next. Thus polypeptidechains have an end with an unbound carboxyl group, the C-terminus, andan end with an amine group, the N-terminus. The convention for writingpeptide sequences is to put the N-terminus on the left and write thesequence from N- to C-terminus. When the protein is translated frommessenger RNA, it is created from N-terminus to C-terminus. “N-terminustruncated” means that up to 99% of amino acids of a protein are missingfrom the N-terminus end of the protein. For example, for a100-amino-acid long full length protein, the N-terminus truncatedversion of this protein may be missing the first amino acid at theN-terminus, the first to the fifth amino acid at the N-terminus, thefirst to the tenth amino acid at the N-terminus, the first to thetwentieth amino acid at the N-terminus, the first to the thirtieth aminoacid at the N-terminus, the first to the fortieth amino acid at theN-terminus, the first to the fiftieth amino acid at the N-terminus, thefirst to the sixtieth amino acid at the N-terminus, the first to theseventies amino acid at the N-terminus, the first to the eightieth aminoacid at the N-terminus, the first to the ninetieth amino acid at theN-terminus or the first to the ninety ninth amino acid at theN-terminus. More specifically, The N-terminus truncated pwp1 may bemissing the first amino acid at the N-terminus, the first one to twentyamino acids, the first one through forty amino acids, the first onethrough sixty amino acids, the first one through eighty amino acids, thefirst one through one hundred amino acids, the first one through onehundred fifty amino acids, the first one through two hundred aminoacids, the first one through two hundred thirty amino acids. TheN-terminus truncated pwp2 may be missing the first amino acid at theN-terminus, the first one to twenty amino acids, the first one throughforty amino acids, the first one through sixty amino acids, the firstone through eighty amino acids, the first one through one hundred aminoacids, the first one through one hundred fifty amino acids, the firstone through two hundred amino acids, the first one through two hundredthirty amino acids. More specifically, pwp1 or pwp2 may be missing thefirst one through fifty two amino acids as shown in SEQ ID NO: 20 andSEQ ID NO: 21 in Example 9.

A “plant” of the present invention includes, but is not limited toangiosperms and gymnosperms such as potato, tomato, tobacco, avocado,alfalfa, lettuce, carrot, strawberry, sugarbeet, cassava, sweet potato,soybean, pea, bean, cucumber, grape, brassica, maize, turf grass, wheat,rice, barley, sorghum, oat, oak, eucalyptus, walnut, and palm. Thus, aplant may be a monocot or a dicot. “Plant” and “plant material,” as usedinterchangeably herein, also encompasses plant cells, seed, plantprogeny, propagule whether generated sexually or asexually, anddescendents of any of these, such as cuttings or seed. “Plant material”may refer to plant cells, cell suspension cultures, callus, embryos,meristematic regions, callus tissue, leaves, roots, shoots,gametophytes, sporophytes, pollen, seeds, germinating seedlings, andmicrospores. Plants may be at various stages of maturity and may begrown in liquid or solid culture, or in soil or suitable media in pots,greenhouses or fields. Expression of an introduced leader, trailer orgene sequences in plants may be transient or permanent.

“Regulatory sequences or elements” refers to those sequences which arestandard and known to those in the art, that may be included in theexpression vectors to increase and/or maximize transcription of a geneof interest or translation of the resulting RNA in a plant system. Theseinclude, but are not limited to, promoters, peptide export signalsequences, introns, polyadcnylation, and transcription terminationsites. Methods of modifying nucleic acid constructs to increaseexpression levels in plants are also generally known in the art (see,e.g. Rogers et al., 260 J. Biol. Chem. 3731-38, 1985; Cornejo et al., 23Plant Mol. Biol. 567: 81, 1993). In engineering a plant system to affectthe rate of transcription of a protein, various factors known in theart, including regulatory sequences such as positively or negativelyacting sequences, enhancers and silencers, as well as chromatinstructure may have an impact. The present invention provides that atleast one of these factors may be utilized in engineering plants toexpress a protein of interest. The regulatory sequences of the presentinvention are native genetic elements, i.e., are isolated from theselected plant species to be modified. The promoters that are used toinitiate transcription of the desired polynucleotide may beconstitutive, tissue-preferred, or inducible promoters or permutationsthereof. “Strong” promoters, for instance, include the potatoubiquitin-7 and ubiquitin-3 promoters, and ubiquitin promoters frommaize, rice, and sugarcane. They also include the rice actin promoter,various rubisco small subunit promoters, rubisco activase promoters, andrice actin promoters. Good tissue-preferred promoters that are mainlyexpressed in potato tubers include the promoters of the granule-boundstarch synthase and ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase genes. There arevarious inducible promoters, but typically an inducible promoter can bea temperature-sensitive promoter, a chemically-induced promoter, or atemporal promoter. Specifically, an inducible promoter can be a Hahsp17.7 G4 promoter, a wheat wcs120 promoter, a Rab 16A gene promoter,an α-amylase gene promoter, a pin2 gene promoter, or a carboxylasepromoter.

“Resistance” in the context of plant pathology means the power orcapacity of a plant, explant or plant cell to withstand, endure, orsurvive the harmful effects or influences, such as disease, toxicity,and infection, by an harmful agent, such as a pathogen, insect, plant,bacteria, or virus. Resistance is a relative term that is often measuredby how long the plant, explant, or plant cell, can tolerate harmfuleffects of the invading agent. For instance, the plant transformed withthe present technology may exhibit disease symptoms for 1-7 days, 1-4weeks, 1-12 months, 1-5 years, or for the entire lifetime of the plantlater than a plant that has not been transformed to express one of thepwp1 or pwp2 polynucleotides disclosed herein.

The term “recessive” in the context of the present invention describesan allele that causes a phenotype (visible or detectable characteristic)that is only seen in a homozygous genotype (an organism that has twocopies of the same allele) and never in a heterozygous genotype. In thisregard, “recessive resistance” means that the resistance phenotype isonly seen in homozygous genotype of the resistance allele.

“Sequence identity” or “identity” in the context of two nucleic acid orpolypeptide sequences includes reference to the residues in the twosequences which are the same when aligned for maximum correspondenceover a specified region. When percentage of sequence identity is used inreference to proteins it is recognized that residue positions which arenot identical often differ by conservative amino acid substitutions,where amino acid residues are substituted for other amino acid residueswith similar chemical properties (e.g. charge or hydrophobicity) andtherefore do not change the functional properties of the molecule. Wheresequences differ in conservative substitutions, the percent sequenceidentity may be adjusted upwards to correct for the conservative natureof the substitution. Sequences which differ by such conservativesubstitutions are said to have “sequence similarity” or “similarity”.Means for making this adjustment are well-known to those of skill in theart. Typically this involves scoring a conservative substitution as apartial rather than a full mismatch, thereby increasing the percentagesequence identity. Thus, for example, where an identical amino acid isgiven a score of 1 and a non-conservative substitution is given a scoreof zero, a conservative substitution is given a score between zeroand 1. The scoring of conservative substitutions is calculated, e.g.,according to the algorithm of Meyers and Miller, Computer Applic. Biol.Sci., 4: 11-17 (1988) e.g., as implemented in the program PC/GENE(Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif., USA).

“Percentage of sequence identity” means the value determined bycomparing two optimally aligned sequences over a comparison window,wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence in the comparisonwindow may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) as compared tothe reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions)for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentage is calculatedby determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleicacid base or amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield thenumber of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions bythe total number of positions in the window of comparison andmultiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequenceidentity.

Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well-known in theart. Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison may be conducted bythe local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981); by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch,J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443 (1970); by the search for similarity method ofPearson and Lipman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444 (1988); bycomputerized implementations of these algorithms, including, but notlimited to: CLUSTAL in the PC/Gene program by Intelligenetics, MountainView, Calif.; GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA, and TFASTA in the WisconsinGenetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group (GCG), 575 ScienceDr., Madison, Wis., USA; the CLUSTAL program is well described byHiggins and Sharp, Gene 73: 237-244 (1988); Higgins and Sharp, CABIOS 5:151-153 (1989); Corpet, et al., Nucleic Acids Research 16: 10881-90(1988); Huang, et al., Computer Applications in the Biosciences 8:155-65 (1992), and Pearson, et al., Methods in Molecular Biology 24:307-331 (1994).

The BLAST family of programs which can be used for database similaritysearches includes: BLASTN for nucleotide query sequences againstnucleotide database sequences; BLASTX for nucleotide query sequencesagainst protein database sequences; BLASTP for protein query sequencesagainst protein database sequences; TBLASTN for protein query sequencesagainst nucleotide database sequences; and TBLASTX for nucleotide querysequences against nucleotide database sequences. See, Current Protocolsin Molecular Biology, Chapter 19, Ausubel, et al., Eds., GreenePublishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York (1995); Altschul et al., J.Mol. Biol., 215:403-410 (1990); and, Altschul et al., Nucleic Acids Res.25:3389-3402 (1997).

Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available, e.g.,through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Thisalgorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs)by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, whicheither match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T whenaligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T isreferred to as the neighborhood word score threshold. These initialneighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to findlonger HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in bothdirections along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignmentscore can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, fornucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair ofmatching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatchingresidues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is usedto calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in eachdirection are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off bythe quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative scoregoes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or morenegative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence isreached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine thesensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (fornucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, anexpectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison ofboth strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses asdefaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and theBLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff (1989) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).

In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLASTalgorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity betweentwo sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA90:5873-5877 (1993)). One measure of similarity provided by the BLASTalgorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides anindication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide oramino acid sequences would occur by chance.

BLAST searches assume that proteins can be modeled as random sequences.However, many real proteins comprise regions of nonrandom sequenceswhich may be homopolymeric tracts, short-period repeats, or regionsenriched in one or more amino acids. Such low-complexity regions may bealigned between unrelated proteins even though other regions of theprotein are entirely dissimilar. A number of low-complexity filterprograms can be employed to reduce such low-complexity alignments. Forexample, the SEG (Wooten and Federhen, Comput. Chem., 17:149-163 (1993))and XNU (Claverie and States, Comput. Chem., 17:191-201 (1993))low-complexity filters can be employed alone or in combination.

Multiple alignment of the sequences can be performed using the CLUSTALmethod of alignment (Higgins and Sharp (1989) CABIOS. 5:151-153) withthe default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Defaultparameters for pairwise alignments using the CLUSTAL method are KTUPLE1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5.

A “trait” is a distinguishing feature or characteristic of a plant,which may be altered according to the present invention by integratingone or more “desired polynucleotides” and/or screenable/selectablemarkers into the genome of at least one plant cell of a transformedplant. The “desired polynucleotide(s)” and/or markers may confer achange in the trait of a transformed plant, by modifying any one of anumber of genetic, molecular, biochemical, physiological, morphological,or agronomic characteristics or properties of the transformed plant cellor plant as a whole. Thus, expression of one or more, stably integrateddesired polynucleotide(s) in a plant genome, may alter a trait that isselected from the group consisting of, but not limited to, increaseddrought tolerance, enhanced cold and frost tolerance, improved vigor,enhanced color, enhanced health and nutritional characteristics,improved storage, enhanced yield, enhanced salt tolerance, enhancedheavy metal tolerance, increased disease tolerance, increased insecttolerance, increased water-stress tolerance, enhanced sweetness,improved vigor, improved taste, improved texture, decreased phosphatecontent, increased germination, increased micronutrient uptake, improvedstarch composition, and improved flower longevity.

“Transformation” of a plant is a process by which DNA is stablyintegrated into the genome of a plant cell. “Stably” refers to thepermanent, or non-transient retention and/or expression of apolynucleotide in and by a cell genome. Thus, a stably integratedpolynucleotide is one that is a fixture within a transformed cell genomeand can be replicated and propagated through successive progeny of thecell or resultant transformed plant. Transformation may occur undernatural or artificial conditions using various methods well known in theart. See, for instance, METHODS IN PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ANDBIOTECHNOLOGY, Bernard R. Glick and John E. Thompson (eds), CRC Press,Inc., London (1993); Chilton, Scientific American, 248) (6), pp. 36-45,1983; Bevan, Nucl. Acids. Res., 12, pp. 8711-8721, 1984; and VanMontague et al., Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 210(1180), pp. 351-65,1980. Plants also may be transformed using “Refined Transformation” and“Precise Breeding” techniques. See, for instance, Rommens et al. in NewZealand Patent 535,395, U.S. Pat. No. 7,250,554, U.S. Pat. No.7,534,934, WO2005/004585, U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,430, US-2005-0034188,WO2005/002994, and New Zealand Patent 536,037, which are allincorporated herein by reference.

Stably integrated DNA into the genome of a plant cell does notnecessarily mean that the integrated DNA is continuously expressed inall parts of the plant. For instance, in one embodiment of the presenttechnology the integrated DNA may be expressed in substantially allcells of the plant, or in 50%-99% of the cells of the plant. In anotherembodiment the integrated DNA may be expressed in one or more of theleaves, stem, flowers, reproductive organs, roots, and fruits andvegetables of the plant, such as in tubers of a transformed potatoplant. As disclosed elsewhere herein a stably integrated polynucleotidemay be expressed continuously or transiently over a period of time. Forinstance, a transformed cultivated plant of the present invention may beresistant to PVY virus for 1-5 days, 1 week, 2-4 weeks, 1 month, 2-12months, 1 year, 2-5 years, 5-10 years, 10-50 years or 50-100 years.

“Transformation vector” is a plasmid that can be maintained inAgrobacterium, and contains at least one Right Border or initialcleavage site. Infection of explants with Agrobacterium strains carryinga transformation vector and application of transformation procedureswill produce transformed calli, shoots, and/or plants that contain atleast part of the transformation vector stably integrated into theirgenome. The vector may comprise a selectable marker to aididentification of plants that have been stably transformed.

A “transgenic plant” of the present invention is one that comprises atleast one cell genome in which an exogenous nucleic acid has been stablyintegrated. According to the present invention, a transgenic plant is aplant that comprises only one genetically modified cell and cell genome,or is a plant that comprises some genetically modified cells, or is aplant in which all of the cells are genetically modified. A transgenicplant of the present invention may be one that comprises expression ofthe desired polynucleotide, i.e., the exogenous nucleic acid, in onlycertain parts of the plant. Thus, a transgenic plant may contain onlygenetically modified cells in certain parts of its structure.

A “tuber” is a thickened, usually underground, food-storing organ thatlacks both a basal plate and tunic-like covering, which corms and bulbshave. Roots and shoots grow from growth buds, called “eyes,” on thesurface of the tuber. Some tubers, such as caladiums, diminish in sizeas the plants grow, and form new tubers at the eyes. Others, such astuberous begonias, increase in size as they store nutrients during thegrowing season and develop new growth buds at the same time. Tubers maybe shriveled and hard or slightly fleshy. They may be round, flat,odd-shaped, or rough. Examples of tubers include, but are not limited toahipa, apio, arracacha, arrowhead, arrowroot, baddo, bitter casava,Brazilian arrowroot, cassava, Chinese artichoke, Chinese water chestnut,coco, cocoyam, dasheen, eddo, elephant's ear, girasole, goo, Japaneseartichoke, Japanese potato, Jerusalem artichoke, jicama, lily root, linggaw, mandioca, manioc, Mexican potato, Mexican yam bean, old cocoyam,potato, saa got, sato-imo, secgoo, sunchokc, sunroot, sweet casava,sweet potatoes, tanicr, tannia, tannicr, tapioca root, topinambour,water lily root, yam bean, yam, and yautia. Examples of potatoesinclude, but are not limited to Russet Potatoes, Round White Potatoes,Long White Potatoes, Round Red Potatoes, Yellow Flesh Potatoes, and Blueand Purple Potatoes.

Tubers may be classified as “microtubers,” “minitubers,” “near-mature”tubers, and “mature” tubers. Microtubers are tubers that are grown ontissue culture medium and are small in size. By “small” is meant about0.1 cm-1 cm. A “minituber” is a tuber that is larger than a microtuberand is grown in soil. A “near-mature” tuber is derived from a plant thatstarts to senesce, and is about 9 weeks old if grown in a greenhouse. A“mature” tuber is one that is derived from a plant that has undergonesenescence. A mature tuber is, for example, a tuber that is about 12 ormore weeks old.

A plant-derived transfer-DNA (“P-DNA”) border sequence of the presentinvention is not identical in nucleotide sequence to any knownbacterium-derived T-DNA border sequence, but it functions foressentially the same purpose. That is, the P-DNA can be used to transferand integrate one polynucleotide into another. A P-DNA can be insertedinto a tumor-inducing plasmid, such as a Ti-plasmid from Agrobacteriumin place of a conventional T-DNA, and maintained in a bacterium strain,just like conventional transformation plasmids. The P-DNA can bemanipulated so as to contain a desired polynucleotide, which is destinedfor integration into a plant genome via bacteria-mediated planttransformation. See Rommens et al. in NEW ZEALAND PATENT 535,395,US-2003-0221213, U.S. Pat. No. 7,534,934, and WO2005/004585, which areall incorporated herein by reference.

Thus, a P-DNA border sequence is different by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or more nucleotides from aknown T-DNA border sequence from an Agrobacterium species, such asAgrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes.

A P-DNA border sequence is not greater than 99%, 98%, 97%, 96%, 95%,94%, 93%, 92%, 91%, 90%, 89%, 88%, 87%, 86%, 85%, 84%, 83%, 82%, 81%,80%, 79%, 78%, 77%, 76%, 75%, 74%, 73%, 72%, 71%, 70%, 69%, 68%, 67%,66%, 65%, 64%, 63%, 62%, 61%, 60%, 59%, 58%, 57%, 56%, 55%, 54%, 53%,52%, 51% or 50% similar in nucleotide sequence to an Agrobacterium T-DNAborder sequence.

Methods were developed to identify and isolate transfer DNAs fromplants, particularly potato and wheat, and made use of the border motifconsensus described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,534,934, which is incorporatedherein by reference.

In this respect, a plant-derived DNA of the present invention, such asany of the sequences, cleavage sites, regions, or elements disclosedherein is functional if it promotes the transfer and integration of apolynucleotide to which it is linked into another nucleic acid molecule,such as into a plant chromosome, at a transformation frequency of about99%, about 98%, about 97%, about 96%, about 95%, about 94%, about 93%,about 92%, about 91%, about 90%, about 89%, about 88%, about 87%, about86%, about 85%, about 84%, about 83%, about 82%, about 81%, about 80%,about 79%, about 78%, about 77%, about 76%, about 75%, about 74%, about73%, about 72%, about 71%, about 70%, about 69%, about 68%, about 67%,about 66%, about 65%, about 64%, about 63%, about 62%, about 61%, about60%, about 59%, about 58%, about 57%, about 56%, about 55%, about 54%,about 53%, about 52%, about 51%, about 50%, about 49%, about 48%, about47%, about 46%, about 45%, about 44%, about 43%, about 42%, about 41%,about 40%, about 39%, about 38%, about 37%, about 36%, about 35%, about34%, about 33%, about 32%, about 31%, about 30%, about 29%, about 28%,about 27%, about 26%, about 25%, about 24%, about 23%, about 22%, about21%, about 20%, about 15%, or about 5% or at least about 1%.

Any of such transformation-related sequences and elements can bemodified or mutated to change transformation efficiency. Otherpolynucleotide sequences may be added to a transformation sequence ofthe present invention. For instance, it may be modified to possess 5′-and 3′-multiple cloning sites, or additional restriction sites. Thesequence of a cleavage site as disclosed herein, for example, may bemodified to increase the likelihood that backbone DNA from theaccompanying vector is not integrated into a plant genome.

Any desired polynucleotide may be inserted between any cleavage orborder sequences described herein. For example, a desired polynucleotidemay be a wild-type or modified gene that is native to a plant species,or it may be a gene from a non-plant genome. For instance, whentransforming a potato plant, an expression cassette can be made thatcomprises a potato-specific promoter that is operably linked to adesired potato gene or fragment thereof and a potato-specificterminator. The expression cassette may contain additional potatogenetic elements such as a signal peptide sequence fused in frame to the5′-end of the gene, and a potato transcriptional enhancer. The presentinvention is not limited to such an arrangement and a transformationcassette may be constructed such that the desired polynucleotide, whileoperably linked to a promoter, is not operably linked to a terminatorsequence.

In addition to plant-derived elements, such elements can also beidentified in, for instance, fungi and mammals. Several of these specieshave already been shown to be accessible to Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation. See Kunik et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1871-1876,2001, and Casas-Flores et al., Methods Mol Biol 267: 315-325, 2004,which are incorporated herein by reference.

When a transformation-related sequence or element, such as thosedescribed herein, are identified and isolated from a plant, and if thatsequence or element is subsequently used to transform a plant of thesame species, that sequence or element can be described as “native” tothe plant genome.

A “variant” is understood to mean a nucleotide or amino acid sequencethat deviates from the standard, or given, nucleotide or amino acidsequence of a particular gene or protein. The terms, “isoform,”“isotype,” and “analog” also refer to “variant” forms of a nucleotide oran amino acid sequence. An amino acid sequence that is altered by theaddition, removal or substitution of one or more amino acids, or achange in nucleotide sequence, may be considered a “variant” sequence.The variant may have “conservative” changes, wherein a substituted aminoacid has similar structural or chemical properties, e.g., replacement ofleucine with isoleucine. A variant may have “nonconservative” changes,e.g., replacement of a glycine with a tryptophan. Analogous minorvariations may also include amino acid deletions or insertions, or both.Guidance in determining which amino acid residues may be substituted,inserted, or deleted may be found using computer programs well known inthe art such as Vector NTI Suite (InforMax, MD) software.

A “vector” which may also be regarded as a “plasmid” or “construct” is avehicle used to transfer genetic material to a target cell. A vector maytypically contain a desired polynucleotide, which shares sequenceidentity with at least part of a target gene that may be operably linkedto a promoter and a terminator, or to two convergently-orient promoters,or in a expression cassette that lacks terminators. As is wellappreciated, the promoter initiates transcription, while the terminatorends transcription at a specific site and subsequently mediatespolyadenylation. Such transcript processing can be important forstability of the transcript and its transport from the nucleus and intothe cytoplasm. On the other hand, another aspect of the presenttechnology is a silencing construct that expresses a desiredpolynucleotide by two convergently-oriented promoters in the absence ofany operably-linked terminators. These constructs produce unspecifiedRNA transcripts that are particularly effective in silencing anendogenous target gene. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 7,713,735,which is incorporated herein by reference.

A vector of the present invention can be used to efficiently reduce orprevent the transcription or translation of a target nucleic acid bytriggering convergent transcription of a desired polynucleotide. Henceone goal of the present invention is to provide constructs that producenucleic acid molecules that prevent or reduce expression of a gene or ofa gene product, such as an RNA transcript or protein.

A wild potato is related to, but is not, a cultivated potato, andbelongs to the Solanaceae family. There are about 199 species of wildpotato, and about 90% of them grow in Bolivia, Peru, Argentina, andMexico. As used herein, a wild potato may also be regarded as anuncultivated or non-cultivated potato. Hence, wild, uncultivated, andnon-cultivated are used interchangeably throughout the application torefer to the class of potatoes that do not belong to the cultivatedclass of potatoes, such as those used for commercial food, as disclosedelsewhere herein. Thus, a wild potato does not become classified as a“cultivated” potato merely because it has been grown somewhere otherthan where it is found naturally. That is, a wild potato species thathas been transferred to a greenhouse or cultivatable field andthereafter grown under the direction and attention of man, does not, forthe purposes of the present invention, become re-classified as a“cultivated” potato in that new environment. Examples of wild potatospecies include but are not limited to Solanum L. species, such asSolanaceae sect. Petota Dumort, and Solanum sect. Etuberosum. SeeHijmans and Spooner, American Journal of Botany, 88(11): 2101-2112(2001), which is incorporated herein by reference. Particular examplesof wild potato species include Solanum etuberosum (accession PI245939),S. chacoense (accessions PI175446 and PI175419), and S. demissumaccession PI175423. Accordingly, the present invention encompasses theidentification and isolation of viral resistant genes from one or morewild potato genomes, and the transformation of cultivated potato plantswith one or more of those wild viral resistant genes, or fragmentsthereof.

Accordingly, as aspect of the present invention is the introduction of awild homolog of one or more eIF4E genes into a plant, explant, or cell,in order to confer virus resistance to that plant, explant, or cell. Forinstance, one example of the plant is cultivated potato plant. Oneexample of the wild homolog of eIF4E gene is pwp1. Pwp1 can beintroduced into the genome of a plant to confer resistance, or thenative eIF4E can be mutated to contain one or more pwp1-specific aminoacids, in order to confer resistance. One example of a plant in thisaspect of the present invention is a cultivated potato plant thatexhibits resistance to PVY virus.

1. The Potato Virus Y

Potato virus Y (PVY, also called Solanum virus 2) is a plant pathogenicvirus of the family Potyviridae, and one of the most important plantviruses affecting potato production. PVY may severely depress yields ofcultivated potato and is spread by aphids in a nonpersistent manner andby human activity. This means that using the same line of potato forproduction of seed potatoes for several consecutive generations may leadto a progressive increase in viral load and subsequent loss of crop.

PVY infection of potato plants results in a variety of symptomsdepending on the viral strain. The mildest of these symptoms isproduction loss, but the most detrimental is “potato tuber necroticringspot disease” (PTNRD). Necrotic ringspots render potatoesunmarketable and can therefore result in a significant loss of income.The increased rate of infection in recent years may be attributed toseveral factors. These include a marked decrease in the effectivenessand administration of chemicals used in vector control, the use ofinfected seed potatoes in cultivation, incorrect irrigation and farmingmethods as well as a lack of a sensitive, rapid and reliable method ofdetection.

There are about five-thousand cultivated potato varieties worldwidebelonging to eight or nine species, and about 200 wild species andsubspecies. None of the more commercially important cultivated potatovarieties, however, exhibit resistance against theagronomically-devastating PVY virus. Furthermore, besides infectingpotato, PVY affects other solanaceous crops (tomato, pepper) and weeds(nightshade, groundcherry). Accordingly, the present invention can beapplied to a variety of plants, not only potato, such as to but notlimited to tomato, pepper, nightshade, and groundcherry.

2. eIF4E

eIF4E (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E) is a eukaryotictranslation initiation factor involved in directing ribosomes to the capstructure of mRNAs to initiate translation. In performing its function,eIF4E binds to the mRNA cap structure (i.e., first nucleotide on the 5′end of an mRNA molecule) and 7 methyl guanosine (m7G) to effectivelysandwich m7G between 2 tryptophan residues. There are at least twoendogenous eIF4E alleles (SEQ ID NO: 6 and SEQ ID NO: 35) as shown inthe sequence listing and FIG. 2.

eIF4E protein can exist in free form or as part of a multiprotainpre-initiation complex termed EIF4E. The other subunits of EIF4E areEIF4F, EIF4A and EIF4G. Almost all cellular proteins require eIF4E inorder to be translated into protein.

Some viruses cut eIF4G so that eIF4E binding site is removed. In doingso the virus can translate its own protein without eIF4E. Some cellularproteins, e.g., heat shock proteins, also don't require eIF4E in orderto be translated.

As explained below, two new eIF4E-like genes were identified by thepresent inventors from wild potato genome, and are the ones that wassurprisingly found to confer resistance to PVY virus.

3. Testing for PVY Virus Resistance

Resistance to PVY virus can be tested in the following manner: first,infect a plant by rubbing the plant's leaf surface with a leaf extractof PVY-infected host. Second, assess how long it takes for typicaldisease symptoms, such as leaf curling, and mild mottling, to occur.Longer time signifies resistance to PVY virus. More accurate, molecularlevel testing of PVY resistance can be done by using a PVY-specificenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed by Agdia (Elkhart,Ind.) to detect the presence of PVY protein. For example, see R. G.Bouzid et al, PVY-resistant transformed potato plants expressing ananti-NIa protein scFv antibody, Molecular Biotechnology, Volume 33,Number 2, 133-140, (2006). The ELISA assay can be performed according tothe steps detailed in Example 12. The longer it takes for PVY protein tobe detected in the plant, the more resistant the plant is to PVY virus.Thus testing for the presence of PVY protein is one method fordetermining the resistance state of any of transformed plants disclosedherein.

4. The New Pwp1 and Pwp2 PVY Resistance Gene Isolated from Wild Potato

Two new and unique eIF4E genes in wild potato (SEQ ID NO.: 1, SEQ IDNO:3) were identified and isolated as described herein. As explainedbelow, these new sequences are given the name herein as “pwp1”and“pwp2”. The significance of the pwp1 gene is exemplified by the factthat it is expressed in three of the five species analyzed: Solanumetuberosum accession PI245939, S. chacoense accessions PI175446 andPI175419, and S. demissum accession PI175423. The gene was not expressedin S. stoloniferum accessions PI195195 and PI275244, and S. phureja. Thesignificance of pwp2 gene is exemplified by the fact that it isexpressed in both accessions (PI195195 and PI275244) of the S.stoloniferum species.

The wild potato version of the pwp1 and pwp2 genes encode proteins (SEQID NO.: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4) that is surprisingly different from the eIF4Efrom cultivated potato (SEQ ID NO.: 5 for gene, SEQ ID NO.: 6 forprotein) (FIG. 2). It has multiple unique amino acids that are differentfrom any of the genes analyzed by the prior art (FIG. 3). The wildpotato pwp1 protein contains ten amino acids that differ from the eIF4Efrom cultivated potato: (i) T54, (ii) S68, (iii) I70, (iv) K72, (v) T76,(vi) A77, (vii) V128, (viii) A130, (ix) S172 and (x) S175. The wildpotato pwp2 protein contains five amino acids that differ from the eIF4Efrom cultivated potato: (i) T10, (ii) A23, (iii) Y57, (iv) N99, and (v)S 140.

Importantly, all three species (Solanum etuberosum accession PI245939,S. chacoense accessions PI175446 and PI175419, and S. demissum accessionPI175423) expressing the new eIF4E gene pwp1 displayed resistanceagainst the potyvirus PVY strains PVY⁰ and PVY^(WI). And both accessions(PI195195 and PI275244) of the S. stoloniferum species expressing thenew eIF4E gene pwp2 displayed resistance against the potyvirus PVYstrains PVY⁰ and PVY^(WI). The isolated genes are designated, therefore,as associated with “PVY resistance in wild potato” (pwp1 and pwp2).

These potato pwp1 and pwp2 sequences can readily be used to identifyother plant sequences and genes useful for conferring PVY resistance toother species of plants. Such species include, but are not limited to,monocotyledenous plant, selected from the group consisting of wheat,turf, turf grass, cereal, maize, rice, oat, wheat, barley, sorghum,orchid, iris, lily, onion, banana, sugarcane, sorghum, and palm, anddicotyledenous plant, selected from the group consisting of avacado,potato, tobacco, tomato, sugarbeet, broccoli, cassava, sweet potato,pepper, cotton, poinsetta, legumes, alfalfa, soybean, carrot,strawberry, lettuce, oak, maple, walnut, rose, mint, squash, daisy, andcactus.

Along those lines, it is shown herein that such sequences were used toidentify PVY resistance genes from pepper: the modified pepper eIF4E,mpe1 (i.e., pepper equivalent of pwp1) can confer strong PVY resistanceto potato species (FIGS. 9 and 10). The results in FIGS. 9 and 10illustrates that a skilled artisan can readily use the modified eIF4Efrom one species to confer PVY resistance to another species.

The present invention comprises proteins that confer PVY resistance butwhich do not necessarily comprise a sequence that fits the consensussequence of SEQ ID NO: 25:DXXXXKSBQXAWGSSXRXXYTFSXVEXFWXXYNNIHBPSKXXGAD, where X is neutral and Bis a basic amino acid. See Robaglia and Caranta, Trends in PlantScience, 11(1), pp.: 40-45, 2006; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,462. Inanother embodiment, the present invention comprises expressing a wildPVY resistance gene that may or may not comprise the SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38consensus sequence in a cultivated plant that is not resistant to a PVYvirus.

In this regard, neutral amino acid include alanine, asparagine,cysteine, glutamine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine, methionines,phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine andvaline. Basic amino acids include arginine, histidine and lysine. Acidicamino acids include aspartic acid and glutamic acid.

Furthermore, amino acid may be polar or non-polar. Non-polar amino acidsinclude alanine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine, methionines,phenyl-alanine, proline and valine. Polar amino acids include arginine,asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamic acid, glutamine,histidine, lysine, serine, threonine, tryptophan and tyrosine.

Amino acids may also be categorized as charged or non-charged. Chargedamino acids include arginine, aspartate, glutamate, histidine andlysine.

Yet another way to categorize amino acids is hydrophobic versushydrophilic. In this regard, hydrophobic amino acids include alanine,isoleucine, leucine, methionines, phenylalanine, proline, tryptophan,tyrosine and valine. Hydrophilic amino acids include arginine,asparagine, aspartate, cysteine, glutamine, glutamate, histidine,lysine, serine and threonine

Amino acids may be further categorized as aliphatic or aromatic.Aliphatic amino acids include alanine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine andvaline. Aromatic amino acids include histidine, phenylalanine,tryptophan and tyrosine.

Amino acids may also be modified. A large number of modified amino acidsare commercially available through chemical reagent vendors, such asSigma-Aldrich.

Typically, because a conserved substitution with the same type of aminoacid (e.g., neutral to neutral) on a protein does not result insignificant structure change of the protein, the function of the proteinwith the substituted amino acid is not expected to change. For example,a neutral to neutral substitution on eIF4E protein is not expected tosignificantly change its structure. In this regard, the presentinventors unexpectedly discovered that the functions of the pwp1/pwp2protein differ significantly from the native eIF4E protein despite thefact that the difference between the pwp1/pwp2 protein and the eIF4Eprotein are all conserved. In other words, the pwp1/pwp2 protein and theeIF4E protein do have different amino acids at certain positions. Butthese amino acid are of the same type, e.g., both neutral. Because theseamino acids are of the same type, a person skilled in the art would nothave expected pwp1/pwp2 to function significantly different from eIF4E.

As a result, a person skilled in the art typically does not expectconserved substitution to significantly alter the eIF4E protein'sability to bind vpg virus protein. Thus a conserved substitution in theeIF4E protein is not expected to change a plant's sensitivity to PVYvirus.

In addition to the positions represented by X in SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38, askilled artisan may make changes (i.e., substitutions) to the non-Xresidues. Changes may be conservative or non-conservative. In thisregard, conservative changes mean that one amino acid is substituted byanother amino acid having a similar property. For example, a polar aminoacid substituted by another polar amino acid, a hydrophobic amino acidsubstituted by another hydrophobic amino acid, or a neutral amino acidsubstituted by another neutral amino acid. Non-conservative changes meanthat one amino acid is substituted by another amino acid having adifferent property. For example, a neutral amino acid substituted by abasic amino acid or an acidic amino acid, a polar amino acid substitutedby a non-polar amino acid, or a hydrophobic amino acid by a hydrophilicamino acid.

Changes may be made to 1-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 amino acids of SEQ ID NO:25 or 38. Upon making such changes to SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38, a skilledartisan can then transform a plant with the changed SEQ ID NO: 25 or 38sequence and test PVY virus-resistance of the transformed plant. Testingprocedure for PVY virus-resistance is set out in section 3 above.

5. Delayed Disease Progression in Cultivated Potato Plants Transformedwith pwp1 and pwp2

One aspect of the present invention contemplates introducing the wildpotato 1 and 2 (pwp1 and pwp2) gene into a plant in order to confervirus resistance. Transformation with pwp1 or pwp2 typically results indelayed disease progression, which means that, upon PVY virus infection,the transformed potato displays disease symptoms later than theuntransformed potato. For example, in Example 5, the transformed potatowith strong expression of pwp1 begins to display typical diseasesymptoms (leaf curling, and mild mottling) one week later than the otherlines.

The pwp1 or pwp2 transformed plant can be, but is not limited to, acultivated potato. And the virus resistance can be, but is not limitedto, against PVY. This invention contemplates that the transformed plantbe resistant to other PVY related viruses, such as potato virus X (PVX)and potato virus A (PVA). Pwp1 and pwp2 can be introduced into a plantvia various means, which is well known in the art. For instance,transformation may rely on any known method for the insertion of nucleicacid sequences into a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell, includingAgrobacterium-mediated transformation protocols, viral infection,whiskers, electroporation, heat shock, lipofection, polyethylene glycoltreatment, micro-injection, and particle bombardment. Such meanstherefore can be, but are not limited to, Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation (explained in detail in Example 2) or P-DNA mediatedtransformation (explained in detail in Example 5).

6. Transformation with Pwp1 and Pwp2 while Silencing the EndogenouseIF4E Gene

This invention further contemplates downregulating or inhibiting theexpression of the native homology of pwp1 (the eIF4E gene) uponintroducing the pwp1 or pwp2 gene into a plant's genome. The presentinventors discovered that downregulating or inhibiting the expression ofeIF4E gene in addition to expressing the full length pwp1 and pwp2 genewould result in full virus resistance. Instead of delayed progression ofdisease symptom, plants transformed with full length pwp1 or pwp2 inwhich the endogenous eIF4E is silenced are fully resistant to PVY virus.For instance, Example 6 contains detailed data on pwp1 transformedpotato in which the endogenous eIF4E gene is silenced. In sometransformed potato varieties disease symptoms do not occur even after 4weeks of infection with PVY virus. ELISA assay did not detect PVY virusprotein in these transformed potatoes. This invention is not limited todownregulating or inhibiting eIF4E via the silencing cassette in Example6, because a person skilled in the art knows various ways ofdownregulating or inhibiting of the expression of a gene. In thisregard, the endogenous eIF4E may be downregulated or inhibited by, butnot limited to, convergent transcription, sense suppression, anti-sensesuppression and RNAi.

The expression of the endogenous eIF4E gene may be downregulated througha convergent transcription technology as described in U.S. Pat. No.7,713,735, which is incorporated by reference into the presentapplication in its entirety. In this regard, a polynucleotide of eIF4E,such as a desired 20-50 nucleotide fragment of the eIF4E gene, and aninverted repeat of it are positioned in between, and are operably linkedto, two functional promoters with opposite direction of transcription,where neither the eIF4E polynucleotide nor its inverted repeat isoperably linked to a terminator. This construct may be located betweentransfer-DNA border sequences of a plasmid that is suitable forbacterium-mediated plant transformation. The construct may also containa spacer up to 500 nucleotides long between the eIF4E polynucleotide andits inverted repeat. The promoters in the construct can be selected froma variety of different promoters including constitutive promoter, anear-constitutive promoter, a tissue-specific promoter and an induciblepromoter.

The expression of the endogenous eIF4E gene may be downregulated orinhibited through RNA interference (RNAi) as described in Xia H et al.,siRNA-mediated gene silencing in vitro and in vivo, Nature Biotechnology(2002), Vol. 20, 1006-1010, Wesley S V et al., Construct design forefficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. ThePlant Journal (2001) 27(6), 581-590, Meister G et al., Mechanisms ofgene silencing by double-stranded RNA, Nature (2004), Vol. 431, 343-349and Hammond S et al., Post-Translational Gene Silencing byDouble-Stranded RNA, Nature (2001), Vol. 2, 110-119, all of which areincorporated by reference into the present application in theirentireties. In this regard, a self-complementary ‘hairpin’ RNA, or moregenerally, a microRNA or small interference RNA (siRNA) may be designedwith techniques well known to an ordinarily skilled person in the art tobind to the messenger RNA (mRNA) of the eIF4E gene to decrease theactivity of the mRNA, for example, by preventing the mRNA to produce aprotein.

The expression of the endogenous cIF4E gene may be downregulated orinhibited through sense suppression as described in Kimura T., et al.,Absence of amylose in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] followingthe introduction of granule-bound starch synthase I cDNA, Plant CellReports (2001), Vol. 20(7), 663-666 and Chasen, R, Making Sense(Suppression) of Viral RNA-Mediated Resistance. The Plant Cell, Vol. 6,1329-1331, all of which are incorporated by reference into the presentapplication in their entireties. In this regard, sense suppression meansthat when the functionally active fragment or variant of a gene isintroduced into the plant in sense orientation, it causes anidentifiable decrease in expression of the corresponding gene in thetransformed plant relative to an untransformed control plant.Sense-orientation means that the nucleic acid is in the same orientationor has the same polarity as a messenger RNA copy that is translated ortranslatable into protein. Therefore, in the case of the eIF4E gene, thesense-oriented strand of the endogenous eIF4E may be transferred into aplant to decrease the expression of endogenous eIF4E gene. Themechanisms of sense-suppression works include transcriptionalinactivation or post-transcriptional RNA degradation. See Lindsey A R,Transgenic Plant Research, page 116, CRC Press (1998), which isincorporated by reference into the present application in its entirety.

The expression of the endogenous eIF4E gene may be downregulated orinhibited through anti-sense suppression as described in Romer S et al.,Genetic Engineering of a Zeaxanthin-rich Potato by AntisenseInactivation and Co-suppression of Carotenoid Epoxidation., MetabolicEngineering (2002), Vol. 4 (4), 263-272, which is incorporated byreference into the present application in its entirety. In this regard,antisense suppression means that when the antisense-oriented strand of agene is introduced into the plant in sense orientation, it causes anidentifiable decrease in expression of the corresponding gene in thetransformed plant relative to an untransformed control plant.Antisense-orientation means that the nucleic acid is in the oppositeorientation or has the opposite polarity as a messenger RNA copy that istranslated or translatable into protein. Therefore, in the case of theeIF4E gene, the antisense-oriented strand of the endogenous eIF4E may betransferred into a plant to decrease the expression of endogenous eIF4Egene. The mechanisms of antisense-suppression include the antisensestrand of a target gene binding to the mRNA of the target gene andthereby blocking normal translation of the mRNA. See Lindsey A R,Transgenic Plant Research, page 116, CRC Press (1998).

7. Expression of Fragments of Pwp1 or Pwp2 Confers Resistance toPotyviruses

This invention further contemplates introducing fragments of the pwp1 orpwp2 genes, or the pvr1-2 gene from pepper, into a plant in order toconfer virus resistance. It is discovered that, while plants transformedwith full-length pwp1 or pwp2 display delayed disease progression uponPVY virus infection, plants transformed with fragments of pwp1 or pwp2develop full resistance to PVY virus infection. For instance, Example 9describes plants that are fully PVY resistant upon transformation withthe potato pwp1 or pwp2 genes lacking approximately fifty amino acids atthe N terminus. Additionally, plants transformed with aN-terminus-truncated pvr1-2 gene also develop full resistance to PVYvirus infection. Example 9 contains detailed data on these transformedplants.

8. Modifying the Native eIF4E Gene in Cultivated Plants

In addition to introducing the wild potato 1 (pwp1) and wild potato 2(pwp2) genes into a plant in order to confer virus resistance, thisinvention also contemplates substituting the eIF4E gene to make theeIF4E gene look like pwp1 or pwp2. For instance, the native eIF4E can bemade to comprise at least two amino acids substitutions selected fromthe group consisting of (i) T44A (ii) S68N, (iii) I70T , (iv) K72R, (v)T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii) A130S, (ix) S172N and (x) S175V ofSEQ ID NO:6, or (i) T76I, (ii) A23G, (iii) Y47F, (iv) N99Y, (v) L140P ofSEQ ID NO: 6 (mutated sequences disclosed as SEQ ID NOS 83 and 84,respectively). Substituting specific amino acids can be achieved throughsite-directed mutagenesis, which is well known in the art. For instance,see Gilbertson L, Cre-lox Recombination: Cre-ative Tools for PlantBiotechnology, Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 21 (21), 550-555 (2003)(“Gilbertson 2003”), which is incorporated herein by reference.

With regard to modifying a native eIF4E gene in plants, this inventionalso contemplates knocking out or inhibiting the expression of a nativeeIF4E gene of the plant and introducing into the plant at least one copyof a native eIF4E gene comprising at least two amino acid substitutionsselected from the group consisting of (i) T44A (ii) S68N, (iii) I70T ,(iv) K72R, (v) T76I, (vi) A77D, (vii) V128I, (viii) A130S, (ix) S172Nand (x) S175V of SEQ ID NO:6, or (i) T10M, (ii) A23G, (iii) Y47F, (iv)N99Y, (v) L140P of SEQ ID NO: 6 (mutated sequences disclosed as SEQ IDNOS 83 and 84, respectively) (hereafter “an eIF4E gene with twosubstitutions”).

In this regard, the expression of a native cIF4E gene of the plant canbe knocked out or inhibited by methods including, but not limited to,convergent transcription technology, RNA interference (RNAi), sensesuppression and anti-sense suppression, which are described in detail insection 6 above.

An eIF4E gene with two substitutions can be introduced into the plant bymethods well known in the art. These methods include, but are notlimited to:

(1) a marker-free transformation method as described in U.S. Pat. No.7,619,138, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety,

(2) a biolistic (or particle gun) method as described in Wright, M.,Efficient biolistic transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) using the phosphomannose isomerase gene, pmi, asthe selectable marker, Plant Cell Reports, Vol. 20 (5), 429-436 (2001),which is incorporated by reference in its entirety,

(3) an Agrobacterium transformation method as described in Block M.,Genotype-independent leaf disc transformation of potato (Solanumtuberosum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Theor, Appl. Genet., Vol.76, 767774 (1988), which is incorporated by reference in its entirety,

(4) a combination of the biolistic method and the Agrobacteriumtransformation methods as described in Hansen G. et al., “Agrolistic”transformation of plant cells: Integration of T-strands generated inplanta, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., Vol. 93 (25), 14978-14983 (1996),which is incorporated by reference in its entirety,

(5) a cre-lox method as described in Gilbertson 2003.

9. Stacked Traits

In additional to virus resistance, additional traits of a plant may bemodified. Such traits may include, but are not limited to, late blightresistance, low reducing sugar, low free asparagines, low bruising,reduced cold-induced sweetening, low acrylamide, reduced starchphosphate level and increased antioxidant. A number of methods are knownin the art to modify a plant to possess additional traits. For example,a method to confer late blight resistance is described in Song J, et al,Gene RB cloned from Solanum bulbocastanum confers broad spectrumresistance to potato late blight. PNAS (2003) Vol. 100 (16): 9128-9133,which is incorporated by reference into the present application in itsentirety. A method to confer the trait of low reducing sugar isdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,250,554. A method to confer the trait oflow free asparagines is described in European Patent No. 1974039.Methods to confer the traits of low bruising, reduced cold-inducedsweetening or reduced starch phosphate level are described in U.S. Pat.No. 7,250,554. A method to confer the trait of low acrylamide isdescribed in U.S. published patent application 2007/0074304 and U.S.Pat. No. 7,250,554. A method to confer the trait of increasedantioxidant is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,319. U.S. Pat. No.7,250,554, European Patent No. 1974039, U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,319 andother patents or published applications cited herein are incorporated byreference into the present application in their entireties.

A plant of the present invention can be modified to have any combinationof these traits. For example, a plant can be modified to have variouscombinations traits, such as, but not limited to, various combinationsand permutations of Trait (1) PVY resistance (full or delayed); Trait(2) late blight resistance, Trait (3) low reducing sugar, Trait (4) lowfree asparagines, Trait (5) low bruising, Trait (6) reduced cold-inducedsweetening, Trait (7) low acrylamide, Trait (8) reduced starch phosphatelevel, Trait (9) increased antioxidants; and Trait (10) increasedvitamin content, such as increased vitamin C. For instance, Trait (1)(i.e., PVY resistance) may be combined with one or more of Traits(2)-(10). Accordingly, the present technology contemplates the pair wisecombination of Trait (1) with (2); (1) and (3); (1) and (4); (1) and(5); (1) and (6); (1) and (7); (1) and (8); (1) and (9); (1) and (10);as well as every other combinational permutation of these Traits. Inaddition to the combination of Trait (1) with one of more of the Traits(2)-(10), the present invention also contemplates other traits that aperson of ordinary skill in the art can stack or combine with Trait (1).

The following examples serve to illustrate various embodiments of thepresent invention and should not be construed, in any way, to limit thescope of the invention.

All references cited herein, including patents, patent application andpublications, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties,where previously specifically incorporated or not.

Having now fully described this invention, it will be appreciated bythose skilled in the art that the same can be performed within a widerange of equivalent parameters, concentrations and conditions, withoutundue experimentation. This application is intended to cover anyvariations, uses, or adaptations of the invention, following in generalthe principles of the invention, that include such departures from thepresent disclosure as come within known or customary practice within theart to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to theessential features hereinbefore set forth.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Cloning and Characterization of Wild Potato EIF4EAlleles

Two new and unique eIF4E genes in wild potato are disclosed herein. Thenucleic acid sequence for the first new gene is depicted in SEQ IDNO.: 1. It was found that this new gene is expressed in individualsegregating plants (not all plants) of specific accessions of three offive species analyzed:

Individual plants of Solanum etuberosum accession PI245939;

Individual plants of S. chacoense accessions PI175446 and PI175419; and

Individual plants of S. demissum accession PI175423.

This gene was not expressed in three plants of S. stoloniferumaccessions PI195195 and PI275244, and S. phureja. However, it ispossible that more extensive analyses of the accessions mentioned wouldidentify individual segregating plants expressing the gene shown in SEQID NO.: 1.

The nucleic acid sequence for the second gene is depicted in SEQ ID NO.:3. It was found that this new gene is expressed in individualsegregating plants (not all plants) of two accessions of S.stoloniferum.

S. stoloniferum Accession PI195195 and PI27524.

This gene was not expressed in three plants of Solanum etuberosumaccession PI245939, S. chacoense accessions PI175446 and PI175419, S.demissum accession PI175423 and S. phureja. However, it is possible thatmore extensive analyses of the accessions mentioned would identifyindividual segregating plants expressing the gene shown in SEQ ID NO.:3.

Importantly, all plants expressing eIF4E pwp1 and pwp2 genes wereresistant to potyvirus PVY strains PVY⁰ and PVY^(WI).

Because the isolated, wild potato eIF4E genes are associated with PVYresistance in wild potato 1 and 2, they are designated herein as pwp1and pwp2.

The wild potato eIF4E gene, i.e., “pwp1,” encodes a protein with theamino acid sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 2 that is surprisinglydifferent from the cultivated potato eIF4E gene. The DNA sequence forthe cultivated potato eIF4E gene is depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 5 and theencoded amino acid protein sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 6. See FIG.2 for the wild vs. cultivated alignment.

The wild potato eIF4E gene, i.e., “pwp2,” encodes a protein with theamino acid sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 4 that is surprisinglydifferent from the cultivated potato eIF4E gene. The DNA sequence forthe cultivated potato eIF4E gene is depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 5 and theencoded amino acid protein sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO.: 6. Sec FIG.2 for the wild vs. cultivated alignment.

The pwp1 and pwp2 proteins have multiple unique amino acid substitutionsthat are different from any of the genes analyzed by the prior art. SeeFIG. 3. For instance, the wild potato pwp1 protein contains a first pairof substitutions at positions 72 and 76 (K72R and T76I), a second pairat positions 128 and 130 (V128I and A130S) and a third pair at positions172 and 175 (S 172N and S175V). The wild potato pwp2 protein containsfive substitutions through the protein (T10M, A23G, Y47F, N99Y andL140P).

Example 2 Binding Properties of the Pwp1 and Pwp2 Proteins

The products of the pwp1 and pwp2 genes were tested for their ability tobind the viral vpg protein by using the yeast two-hybrid system. Forthis purpose, the pwp1 or pwp2 cDNA was cloned into vector pAD(Stratagene), which also contains a leucine (Leu) biosynthetic marker,to produce a “prey” protein. The “bait” protein was produced byexpressing the Vpg gene into pBD (Stratagene), a vector also carrying atryptophan (Trp) biosynthetic marker.

As shown in FIG. 4, co-transformation of the yeast strain YRG-2 with themodified pAD and pBD vectors (according to the manufacturer'srecommendations) produced colonies on media lacking Leu and Trp but noton media also lacking histidine (His).

In contrast, co-transformations of a control prey vector expressing thepotato eIF4E gene with the vpg-containing pBD vector resulted in colonyformation on media lacking the three amino acids, indicating that onlythe potato eIF4E protein interacted with vpg, thus activating downstreamHis biosynthesis. The inability to bind with vpg suggests that pwp1 andpwp2 expression are associated with PVY resistance in wild potato.

Many of the changes of pwp1 were positioned within domains implicated inmRNA cap binding and VPg interaction. In fact, five of the substitutions(S68N, I70T, K72R, T76I and A77D) were within a degenerate 46-amino aciddomain that was predicted to be the hotspot for potyvirusresistance-linked mutations. Sec FIG. 2, and Robaglia and Caranta,Trends in Plant Science, 11(1), pp.: 40-45, 2006. In contrast to theexpected changes, from either neutral to charged or charged to neutralor oppositely charged amino acids, it was discovered herein that four ofsubstitutions, S68N, I70T, T76I and K72R, involved the substitution ofthe endogenous native basic amino acids with other basic amino acids, orthe endogenous native neutral amino acids to other neutral amino acids(S, N, I and T are all neutral and both K and R are basic). The onlymismatch that was previously predicted to be associated with resistance,A77D, did not interfere with binding of VPg in the yeast two-hybridsystem, and was, therefore, not believed to be critical in mediatingresistance (FIG. 4). This finding implies that pwp1 belongs to a newgroup of cIF4E variants.

Example 3 Method for Identifying Other Pwp Homologs & Sequences

Accessions of wild potato species, some of which are maintained at theUnited States Potato Genebank and elsewhere, can be grown in thegreenhouse and evaluated to determine the presence in their genomes of apwp1 gene or homolog. Specifically, RNA from leaves of individualplants, isolated with the plant RNA-easy kit (Invitrogen), can be usedin one-step reverse-transcriptase PCR reactions (Qiagen) with the primerpair 5′-GGA TCC ATG GCA GCA GCT GAA ATG (SEQ ID NO: 81), and 5′-ACT AGTCTA TAC TGT GTA ACG ATT CTT GGC A (SEQ ID NO: 82) to produce pwp1 eDNAs.Amplified products are then gel purified, and cloned into pGEM-Teasy(Promega), and sequenced.

Example 4 Transfer of Pwp1 and Pwp2 from Wild to Cultivated Potato

The pwp1 cDNA was operably linked to the near-constitutive 35S promoterof cauliflower mosaic virus (SEQ ID NO.: 7) and the terminator of thepotato ubi3 gene (SEQ ID NO.: 8). The resulting expression cassette waspositioned within a T-DNA region of a binary vector to produce pSIM1567.The pwp2 cDNA was operably linked to the near-constitutive PAT promoterof potato (SEQ ID NO.: 9) and the terminator of the potato ubi3 gene(SEQ ID NO.: 8). The resulting expression cassette was positioned withina T-DNA region of a binary vector to produce pSIM1569. Thesetransformation vectors were used to transform the potato variety RangerRusset as follows.

Competent LB4404 cells (50 μL) were incubated for 5 minutes at 37° C. inthe presence of 1 μg of vector DNA, frozen for about 15 seconds inliquid nitrogen (about −196° C.), and incubated again at 37° C. for 5minutes. After adding 1 ml of liquid broth (LB), the treated cells weregrown for 3 hours at 28° C. and plated on LB/agar containingstreptomycin (100 mg/L) and kanamycin (100 mg/L). The vector DNAs werethen isolated from overnight cultures of individual LBA4404 colonies andexamined by restriction analysis to confirm the presence of intactplasmid DNA.

Ten-fold dilutions of overnight-grown Agrobacterium cultures were grownfor 5-6 hours, precipitated for 15 minutes at 2,800 RPM, washed with MSliquid medium (Phytotechnology) supplemented with sucrose (3%, pH 5.7),and resuspended in the same medium to 0.2 OD/600 nm. The resuspendedcells were mixed and used to infect 0.4-0.6 mm internodal segments ofpotato. Infected stems were incubated for two days on co-culture medium(1/10 MS salts, 3% sucrose, pH 5.7) containing 6 g/L agar at 22° C. in aPercival growth chamber (16 hrs light) and subsequently transferred tocallus induction medium (CIM, MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose 3,2.5 mg/L of zeatin riboside, 0.1 mg/L of naphthalene acetic acid, and 6g/L of agar) containing timentin (150 mg/L) and kanamycin (100 mg/L).

After one month of culture on CIM, explants were transferred to shootinduction medium (SIM, MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose, 2.5 mg/Lof zeatin riboside, 0.3 mg/L of giberellic acid GA3, and 6 g/L of agar)containing timentin and kanamycin (150 and 100 mg/L respectively) untilshoots arose. Shoots arising from the explants were transferred to MSmedium with 3% sucrose, 6 g/L of agar and timentin (150 mg/L).Individual leaves from then independent transformants were confirmed byPCR to contain the T-DNA, and then transferred to soil and placed in agrowth chamber (11 hours light, 25° C.).

Transgenic control plants were produced by transforming Ranger Russetwith binary vector pSIM401, which only contains the nptII geneexpression cassette between T-DNA borders.

Example 5 Delayed Disease Progression in Pwp1 Transgenic Potato

Transgenic pSIM1567 plants and their pSIM401 controls were propagated invitro to produce lines, and three copies of each line were transferredto soil. Leaf tissues were used to extract RNA and perform northern blotanalysis using an eIF4E-derived probe. This probe visualizes the totalamount of transcript for both the potato eIF4E gene and the pwp1 genefrom wild potato. Assuming constant expression levels of the cIF4E gene,any increase in transcript levels was assumed to be associated withexpression of the pwp1 gene. Thus, as shown in FIG. 5, most pSIM1567plants were found to express the pwp1 gene. Highest expression levelswere observed in lines pwp1-1, 8, 12, 15 and 25.

After two weeks, the transgenic plants were infected with PVY by rubbinga leaf extract of PVY-infected host plants onto their leaf surface.Plants were assessed for typical disease symptoms (leaf curling, andmild mottling) after both two and three weeks. Leaves of the infectedplants were also analyzed with a PVY-specific enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed by Agdia (Elkhart, Ind.) for thepresence of PVY protein.

Interestingly, disease progression was delayed in 2 lines (1567-15 and1567-25) that expressed the pwp1 gene strongly. These lines developeddisease symptoms one week later than all other lines (Table 2).

Example 6 Enhanced Effect of Pwp1 Gene Expression Upon Silencing of thePotato EIF4E Gene

Sequence analysis of the 5′-untranslated leader and 3′-untranslatedtrailer allowed us to produce a DNA fragment carrying theseeIF4E-specific sequences (SEQ ID NO.: 10). Two copies of this fragmentwere positioned as inverted repeat between the strong Pat promoter (SEQID NO.: 9) and the terminator of the potato ubiquitin-3 gene to producean expression cassette intended to silence the eIF4E gene but not thehomologous pwp1 gene. The silencing cassette was inserted next to anexpression cassette of the Bar gene within the T-DNA borders of a binaryvector to produce pSIM1895, and this vector was used to re-transformRanger Russet line 1567-25.

Nine kanamycin and Bar resistant double-transformants were propagated invitro, and three plants of each line were planted in soil, placed fortwo weeks in a growth chamber, and then infected with PVY. Two weeksafter infection, six out of nine lines showed full PVY resistance asdetermined by the ELISA assay (Table 3). One week later, this resistancewas still evident in three lines. Even four weeks after infection, noPVY protein could be detected in two of the 1567-25/1895 lines. Thus,overexpression of the pwp1 gene, together with eIF4E gene silencing,triggers effective disease resistance against PVY.

In one control experiment, a potato plant was transformed with the eIF4Esilencing construct. Infection of 13 Bar-resistant lines (threeplants/line) did not result in any control of PVY.

Example 7 Overexpression of Pwp2 in Potato Delayed Disease Progressionin Transgenic Potato

Twenty-five transgenic pSIM1569 plants and their pSIM401 controls werepropagated in vitro to produce lines, and three copies of each line weretransferred to soil, placed for two weeks in a growth chamber, and theninfected with PVY. Two weeks after infection, 4 out of twenty-five lines(No. 9, 16, 23 and 25) showed full PVY resistance as determined by theELISA assay. Three weeks after infection, no PVY protein could bedetected in two of the 1569 lines, No. 16 and No. 23. However, at fourweeks after infection, all lines showed PVY-infected symptom and weretested as PVY positive by ELISA (Table 4). Thus, overexpression of thepwp2 gene also delayed disease progression. Four lines that showedresistance at two weeks and one susceptible line (No. 18) were selectedfor expression study. Leaf tissues were used to extract RNA and performnorthern blot analysis using an eIF4E-derived probe. This probevisualizes the total amount of transcript for both the potato eIF4E geneand the pwp2 gene from wild potato. Assuming constant expression levelsof the eIF4E gene, any increase in transcript levels was assumed to beassociated with expression of the pwp2 gene. As shown in FIG. 8, all 5pSIM1569 plants checked were found to express the pwp2 gene. Highestexpression levels were observed in line pwp2-23.

Example 8 Development of Intragenic PVY Resistant Potato Plants

A transfer DNA was designed that consists exclusively of DNA elementsderived from either potato or sexually-compatible wild potato (FIG. 6).This transfer DNA comprises a first expression cassette for the pwp1gene fused to the near-constitutive Pat promoter and the ubi3terminator. The second cassette contains two copies of the untranslated5′ and 3′ sequences of the potato eIF4E gene separated by a potatospacer and positioned between the same regulatory elements. These twocassettes are placed within a potato-derived transfer DNA. See SEQ IDNO.: 11 for the entire sequence.

Marker-free transformation of potato with the all-native transfer DNA(as described in Rommens et al., 2004 and Richael et al., 2008) createsintragenic plants, some of which display PVY resistance.

Example 9 Expression of Fragments of Specific EIF4E Genes ConfersResistance to Potyviruses

Cloning and Deletion Mutagenesis of Pvr1-2 Allele from Pepper

RNA was isolated from leaves of the pepper variety that contains thepurl -2 gene for resistance against potyviruses, using the plantRNA-easy kit (Qiagen). The RNA was used in one-stepreverse-transcriptase PCR reactions (Qiagen) with the primer pair 5′-GGGGAT CCA TGG CAA CAG CTG AA AT (SEQ ID NO: 36), and 5′-CCA CTA GTC TATACG GTG TAA CGA T (SEQ ID NO: 37) (carrying the restriction sites BamHIand SpeI, respectively) to amplify a DNA fragment representing a cDNA ofthe pvr1-2 gene. Amplified products were gel purified and cloned intopGEM-Teasy (Promega); the amino acid sequence encoded by the cDNA isshown in SEQ ID NO: 12. A fragment of the cDNA was obtained by removingthe 5′-part of this cDNA using the primers de125-73 sense 5′-GAT TGG GGATCC ATG GCA AAG CAT CCA TTA GAG CAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 12) and de125-73antisense 5′-ATG CTC TAA TGG ATG CTT TGC CAT GGA TCC CCA ATC-3′ (SEQ IDNO: 13) in an 18-cycleamplification reaction with Pfu Ultra II Fusion HSDNA Polymerase (Agilent). A total of 2 μl DpnI enzyme was added and thereaction incubated for 2 hrs to cleave the template molecules. 5 μl ofthis reaction was then transformed into DH5α competent cells(Invitrogen). Individual deleted clones were sequenced to identify anerror-free clone, which was further subcloned into binary vector.

pSIM1719 Construct and Transformation into Potato

The sequence for complete pvr1-2 is shown as SEQ ID No.: 14. Thepvr1-2-derived fragment, designated here as Fpvr (see SEQ ID No.: 15 forDNA sequence, SEQ ID NO: 16 for amino acid sequence), was operablylinked to the near-constitutive PAT promoter of potato (SEQ ID NO.:9)and the terminator of the potato ubi3 gene (SEQ ID NO.: 8). Theresulting expression cassette was positioned between T-DNA borders of abinary vector to produce pSIM1719. An Agrobacterium LBA4404 straincarrying this transformation vector was used to transform the potatovariety Burbank Russet as described in example 4.

Expression Analyses and Disease Assay for Transgenic Lines ContainingpSIM1719

Transgenic pSIM1719 plants and their pSIM401 controls were propagated invitro to produce lines, and three copies of each line were transferredto soil. Leaf tissues were used to extract RNA and perform northern blotanalysis using an eIF4E-derived probe. 20 μg of leaf RNA was used forNorthern analyses. This probe visualizes the total amount of transcriptfor pepper eIF4E gene. High expression levels were observed in lines1719-11, 17, 20, 23 (FIG. 7).

The disease progression was checked as described in example 5. Two weeksafter infection three lines pSIM1719-11, 17 and 20 showed no symptoms ofinfection and were negative in ELISA. Lines pSIM1719-11, 17 remainednegative in ELISA even after four weeks post infection. Thus, expressionof Fpvr was sufficient to confer PVY resistance to potato.

Most differences between pepper and potato eIF4e protein are in theN-terminal region of the protein and Fpvr might be more stable inproviding resistance. The Fpvr fragment and a similar potato fragmentshown in SEQ ID NO.: 17 show only 11 amino acid differences (SEQ IDNO.:16 and SEQ ID NO.: 17) and 46 differences between their respectivenucleotide sequences (SEQ ID NO.:15 and SEQ ID NO.: 18).

Resistance can also be obtained by making transgenic plants havingsimilar near constitutive expression of the fragment region with of thepwp1 (SEQ ID NO.: 19 and SEQ ID NO.: 20), pwp2 (SEQ ID NO.: 21 and SEQID NO.: 22) and mpe mutations (SEQ ID NO.: 23 and SEQ ID NO.: 24)discussed in EXAMPLE 10 below.

Example 10

The proteins encoded by previously-identified eIF4E genes implicated inpotyvirus resistance comprise an amino acid domain with the consensus:

(SEQ ID NO: 25) DXXXXKSBQXAWGSSXRXXYTFSXVEXFWXXYNNIHBPSKLXXGAD

where X is a neutral amino acid and B is a basic amino acid. SeeRobaglia and Caranta, Trends in Plant Science, 11(1), pp.: 40-45, 2006;and U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,462.

In addition to the pwp1 gene from wild potato species that encodes aprotein with ten differences at positions that are generally conserved,including two amino acids (K69R and A74D, position based on pepper eIF4Eprotein) that are inconsistent with the consensus forresistance-associated eIF4E mutations, and pwp2 gene from wild potatothat encodes a protein with five mismatches at positions that aregenerally conserved, including one amino acid (N96Y, position based onpepper eIF4E protein) that are inconsistent the consensus for resistanceassociated eIF4E mutations.

Two mutant eIF4E genes were created from pepper (mpe, modified CaeIF4Egenes) that encodes protein conferring potyvirus resistance to potatowithout containing an amino acid sequence that conforms to the consensussequence. The DNA and amino acid sequence of modified pepper eIF4E gene1 is shown in SEQ ID NO: 26 and SEQ ID NO.: 27. The DNA and amino acidsequence of modified pepper eIF4E gene 2 is shown in SEQ ID NO.: 28 andSEQ ID NO: 29, respectively. Also created herein was a mutant eIF4E genefrom potato that encodes protein potentially conferring potyvirusresistance to potato without containing an amino acid sequence thatconforms to the consensus sequence. The DNA and amino acid sequence ofthis modified potato eIF4E gene are shown in SEQ ID NO: 30 and SEQ IDNO: 31, respectively.

Transformation of potato with an expression cassette comprising eitherof the modified CaeIF4E genes operably linked to the PAT promoter(pSIM1588 and pSIM1723, FIGS. 9 and 10) resulted in full resistanceagainst PVY as determined by ELISA assays, carried out 4 weeks afterinfection. FIGS. 9 and 10 also show the transformed mpe genes are moreor less overexpressed in selected lines compared to wild type and emptyvector control plants.

Example 11

The sequences described in Examples 1-9 could similarly be used toengineer potyvirus resistance in lettuce and tomato when expressed underthe control of near-constitutive promoters such as 35S or PAT (SEQ IDNO: 7 and SEQ ID NO: 9 respectively) and ubi3 terminator (SEQ ID NO: 8)as mentioned before. The resulting expression cassette can be positionedwithin a T-DNA region of a binary vector. The resultant binary vectorcontaining the gene of interest described in this example is thentransformed into an Agrobacterial strain LBA4404 and can subsequently betransformed into lettuce or tomato as per the transformation protocolsdescribed below. Transgenic control plants can be produced bytransforming lettuce or tomato plants with a control binary vectorcontaining just a selectable marker such as nptII expression cassettewithin the T-DNA borders.

Lettuce Transformation

For sterilization, lettuce seeds were immersed for 30 sec to 1 min in70% ethanol and 15 min. in 10% bleach with a trace of Tween20, followedby 3 rinses with sterile water. Seeds (30-40 per Magenta box) werespread evenly over medium consisting of half-strength MS medium withvitamins (M404, Phytotechnology) with 10 g sucrose per liter, solidifiedwith 2% Gelrite, pH 5.7. Seed germinated at 24° C. with 16/8 L/D.

Agrobacterium harboring a gene of interest such as pSIM1723 (modifiedpepper eIF4E 2, mpe2, constitutively expressed using PAT promoter (SEQID NO: 9) and ubi3 terminator (SEQ ID NO: 8) was grown overnight fromfrozen glycerol stock (−80° C.) in a small volume of Luria Broth withkanamycin and streptomycin selective agents. Two milliliters of thelog-phase over-night culture was added to 18 ml of new LB with selectionand growth with shaking until log phase. Agro was spun down andsuspended in liquid MS medium to achieve an OD₆₀₀ of 0.2.

Seven days from sowing, the cotyledons were excised from seedlings andwounded with a scalpel to give small cuts at right angles to themid-vein. All explants were immersed in the above Agrobacterialsuspension. After 10 minutes, the Agrobacterial suspension was aspiratedaway and the explants were blotted on sterile filter paper. Explantswere placed adaxial side up on co-culture medium that consisted of MSmedium with vitamins (M404, Phytotechnology), 30 g sucrose per liter,0.1 mg/l BAP, 0.1 mg/l NAA and solidified with 6 g/l agar, pH 5.7. Aftertwo days co-culture, explants were moved to regeneration medium thatconsisted of MS medium with vitamins (M404), 30 g sucrose per liter, 0.1mg/l BAP, 0.1 mg/l NAA and solidified with 6 g/l agar, pH 5.7 and 150mg/l of timentin and 100 mg/l kanamycin. Every two weeks, explants aremoved to new regeneration medium. After 2-3 weeks, shoot buds areharvested and transferred to medium that consisted of MS medium withvitamins (M404), 30 g sucrose per liter, 0.01 mg/l BAP, 0.05 mg/l NAAand solidified with 6 g/l agar, pH 5.7 and 150 mg/l of timentin and 100mg/l kanamycin. Two to four weeks later, elongated shoots aretransferred to rooting medium (MS medium without hormones and with 150mg/l timentin and 100 mg/l kanamycin).

Tomato Transformation

Tomato transformation was done essentially as described by Richael etal., 2008. Seeds of tomato (cv. Money Maker) were surface sterilized in20% commercial bleach with 2 drops of Tween-20 for 20 min and rinsedwith sterilized water 3 times for 10 min each. The seeds were germinatedon M404 medium containing 1.5% sucrose and 6 g/l agar (germinationmedium). Hypocotyls of 12 to 14-day old seedlings were cut into segments5 to 8 mm and infected by Agrobacterium. For ipt-based transformation,infected explants were transferred to cocultivation medium containing200 lM acetosyringone. After 2 days, cultivated explants weretransferred to the hormone-free medium. Explants were transferred tofresh medium every 2 weeks. For a conventional tomato transformation(conventional-Tm) the co-cultivated explants were transferred to M404medium containing 2.5 mg/l ZR, 0.1 mg/l indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 75mg/l kanamycin and 150 mg/l timentin (selective medium). Explants weretransferred to the fresh selective medium every 2 weeks. After one monthof cultivation 0.3 mg/l GA3 was added to the selective medium for shootelongation.

The transgenic plants thus produced are propagated in vitro, and threeplants of each line planted in soil and placed in growth chamber for 2weeks and can then be infected with PVY. Progression of susceptible andresistant lines can be checked after 2 and 4 weeks by ELISA assay asdescribed for potato. The transgenic plants still resistant to PVY andnegative in ELISA can be further confirmed for transgene expression bynorthern analyses as described for potato.

REFERENCES

-   Rommens, C M, Haring M A, Swords, K, Davies H V and Belknap, W    R (2007) The intragenic approach as a new extension to traditional    plant breeding. Trends in Plant Sci 12(9): 397-403.-   Richael, C M, Kalyaeva, M, Chretien, R C, Yan, H, Adimulam, S,    Stivison, A, Weeks, J T and Rommens C M. (2008) Cytokinin vectors    mediate marker-free and backbone-free plant transformation.    Transgenic Res. 17:905-917.

Example 12 ELISA Assay

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an assay that relies on anenzymatic conversion reaction and is used to detect the presence of anantibody or an antigen in a sample. The ELISA has been used as adiagnostic tool in medicine and plant pathology, as well as aquality-control check in various industries. In simple terms, in ELISA,an unknown amount of antigen is affixed to a surface, and then aspecific antibody is applied over the surface so that it can bind to theantigen. This antibody is linked to an enzyme, and, in the final step, asubstance containing the enzyme's substrate is added. The subsequentreaction produces a detectable signal, most commonly a color change inthe substrate. In the present invention, ELISA is used to detect thepresence of PVY virus protein. An ELISA assay typically comprises thefollowing steps.

1. Dispense Samples:

Following a loading diagram, dispense 100 μl of prepared sample intosample wells. Dispense 100 μl of positive control into positive controlwells, and dispense 100 μl of general extract buffer into buffer wells.If using a negative control, dispense 100 μl into negative wells.

2. Incubate Plate:

Set the plate inside the humid box and incubate for 2 hours at roomtemperature or overnight in the refrigerator (4° C.).

3. Prepare Enzyme Conjugate:

Both bottles of alkaline phosphatase enzyme conjugate and detectionantibody (bottles A and B) are supplied as a concentrate and must bediluted with ECI buffer before use. The recommended conjugate to bufferratio is given on each label. Dispense the appropriate volume ofprepared ECI buffer into a dedicated container. 100 μl of buffer foreach test well is needed. A full plate will require about 10 ml. Then,add the alkaline phosphatase enzyme conjugate according to the dilutiongiven on the labels. For example, if the dilution given on bottles A andB of concentrated detection antibody and alkaline phosphatase enzymeconjugate is 1:100, and tester are preparing 10 ml of enzyme conjugatesolution, the tester should first dispense 10 ml ECI buffer. Then, add100 μl from bottle A and 100 μl from bottle B to the ECI buffer. Afteradding the reagents from bottles A and B, it is important to mix theenzyme conjugate solution well.

4. Wash Plate:

When the sample incubation is complete, wash the plate. Use a quickflipping motion to dump the wells into a sink or waste container withoutmixing the contents. Fill all the wells completely with 1×PBST, and thenquickly empty them again. Repeat 7 times. After washing, hold the frameupside down and tap firmly on a folded paper towel to remove alldroplets of wash buffer. Inspect the testwells. All wells should be freeof plant tissue. If tissue is present repeat the wash step and tapfirmly on a paper towel.

5. Add Enzyme Conjugate:

Dispense 100 μl of prepared enzyme conjugate per well.

6. Incubate Plate:

Incubate the plate in the humid box for 2 hours at room temperature.

7. Prepare PNP Solution:

Each PNP tablet (ACC 00404) will make 5 ml of PNP solution, at aconcentration of 1 mg/ml, about enough for five 8-well strips. About 15minutes before the end of the above incubation step, measure 5 ml ofroom temperature 1×PNP buffer for each tablet tester will be using.Then, without touching the tablets, add the PNP tablets to the buffer.

8. Wash Plate:

As before, wash the plate 8 times with 1×PBST. Inspect the wells lookingfor the presence of air bubbles. Tap firmly on the paper towel to removeremaining wash buffer and any air bubbles. If air bubbles are stillpresent they may be broken with a clean pipette tip.

9. Add PNP Substrate:

Dispense 100 μl of PNP substrate into each test well.

10. Incubate Plate:

Incubate the plate in a humid box for 60 minutes. Plates should beprotected from direct or intense light.

11. Evaluate Results:

Examine the wells by eye, or measure on a plate reader at 405 nm. Airbubbles which are present at the time of reading can alter results, ifin the light path. It is recommended that bubbles be eliminated prior toreading. Wells in which color develops indicate positive results. Wellsin which there is no significant color development indicate negativeresult. Test results are valid only if positive control wells give apositive result and buffer wells remain colorless. Results may beinterpreted after more than 60 minutes of incubation as long as negativewells remain virtually clear.

TABLE 2 Assessment of disease symptoms and viral presence in pSIM1567plants upon infection with PVY^(NTN+). 2-weeks post infection 3 weeksposit infection Line symptoms ELISA symptoms ELISA pSIM401 control YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-1 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-2 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-3 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-4 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-5 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-6 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-7 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-8 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-9 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-10 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-11 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-12 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-13 Ycs Positive Ycs Positive 1567-14 YcsPositive Ycs Positive 1567-15 No Positive Yes Positive 1567-16 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-17 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-18 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-19 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-20 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-21 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-22 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-23 Yes Positive Yes Positive 1567-24 YesPositive Yes Positive 1567-25 No Positive Yes Positive

TABLE 3 Assessment of disease symptoms and viral presence in 1567-25plants retransformed with pSIM1895 upon infection with PVY^(NTN+).2-weeks post infection 3 weeks posit infection 4 weeks posit infectionLine symptoms ELISA symptoms ELISA symptoms ELISA pSIM401 control YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1567-25/1895-1 No Negative NoPositive N/A Positive 1567-25/1895-2 No Negative No Positive N/APositive 1567-25/1895-3 No Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive1567-25/1895-4 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1567-25/1895-5 YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1567-25/1895-6 No Negative NoNegative No Positive 1567-25/1895-7 No Negative No Negative No Negative1567-25/1895-8 No Negative No Negative No Negative 1567-25/1895-9 NoNegative Yes Positive N/A Positive

TABLE 4 Assessment of disease symptoms and viral presence in pSIM1569plants upon infection with PVY^(NTN+). 2-weeks post infection 3 weeksposit infection 4 weeks posit infection Line symptoms ELISA symptomsELISA symptoms ELISA pSIM401 control Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-1  Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-2  YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-3  Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-4  Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-5  YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-6  Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-7  Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-8  YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-9  No Negative Yes Positive YesPositive 1569-10 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-11 YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-12 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-13 Ycs Positive Ycs Positive N/A Positive 1569-14 YcsPositive Ycs Positive N/A Positive 1569-15 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-16 No Negative No Negative Yes Positive 1569-17 YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-18 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-19 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-20 YesPositive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-21 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-22 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/A Positive 1569-23 NoNegative No Negative Yes Positive 1569-24 Yes Positive Yes Positive N/APositive 1569-25 No Negative Yes Positive Yes Positive

List of SEQ ID NOs:

-   SEQ ID NO: 1 (pwp1 full length polynucleotide sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 2 (pwp1 full length amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 3 (pwp2 full length polynucleotide sequence)-   SEQ ID NO:4 (pwp2 full length amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 5 (eIF4E gene polynucleotide sequence from potato)-   SEQ ID NO: 6 (potato eIF4E gene, allele 1, amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 7 (35S promoter)-   SEQ ID NO: 8 (ubi3 terminator)-   SEQ ID NO: 9 (Pat promoter)-   SEQ ID NO: 10 (EIF4E leader and trailer)-   SEQ ID NO: 11 (all-native transfer DNA for PVY resistance)-   SEQ ID NO: 12 (primer for amplifying pvr1-2)-   SEQ ID NO: 13 (primer for amplifying pvr1-2)-   SEQ ID NO: 14 (pvr1-2 cDNA sequence, full length)-   SEQ ID NO: 15 (pvr1-2-derived fragment, polynucleotide sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 16 (pvr1-2-derived fragment, amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 17 (amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with    pvr1-2 mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 18 (DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pvr1-2    mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 19 (DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp1    mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 20 (amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with    pwp1 mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 21 (amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with    pwp2 mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 22 (DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp2    mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 23 (amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with    mpe mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 24 (DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with mpe    mutations)-   SEQ ID NO: 25 (The consensus sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 26 (modified CaeIF4E, mpe, DNA sequence 1)-   SEQ ID NO: 27(modified CaeIF4E, mpe, amino acid sequence 1)-   SEQ ID NO: 28 (modified CaeIF4E, mpe, DNA sequence 2)-   SEQ ID NO: 29 (modified CaeIF4E, amino acid sequence 2)-   SEQ ID NO: 30 (modified StEIF4E, DNA sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 31 (modified StEIF4E, amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 32 (purl -2 amino acid sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 33 (Potato border-like sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 34 (consensus sequence of the border-like sequence)-   SEQ ID NO: 35 (potato eIF4E gene, allele 2, amino acid sequence)

SEQ ID NO: 1 (pwp1)ATGGCAGCAGCTGAAATGGAGAGAACGACGTCGTTTGATGCAGCTGAGAAGTTGAAGGCCGCCGATGCAGGAGGAGGAGAGGTAGACGATGAACTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAATCAAATGATGCGGCGTCGTATTTGGGGAAAGAAATCACAGTGAAGCATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAACCCTACTGCTAGATCTCGACAAATTGATTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTATATGTTCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAATGTCCGGGTTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCATGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAG SEQ ID NO: 2 (pwp1 protein)MAAAEMERTTSFDAAEKLKAADAGGGEVDDELEEGEIVEESNDAASYLGKEITVKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPTARSRQIDWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVMGADFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPICSNGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVNVRVKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV SEQ ID No 3 (pwp2 DNA sequence)ATGGCAGCAGCTGAAATGGAGAGAACGATGTCGTTTGATGCAGCTGAGAAGCTGAAGGCCGCCGATGGAGGAGGAGGGGAGGTAGACGATGAACTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAATCAAATGATACGGCGTCGTTTTTAGGGAAAGAAATCACAGTGAAGCATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTATTGCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACTATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAGTTTTCCGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGGCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAACGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGCAAACAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTTAG SEQ ID No 4 (pwp2 amino acid sequence)Maaaemertmstdaaeklkaadggggevddeleegeiveesndtasflgkeitvkhplehswtfwfdspiaksrqtawgsslrnvytfstvedfwgayynihhpsklvmgadfhcfkhkiepkwedpvcanggtwkmsfpkgksdtswlytllamighqfdhgdeicgavvsvrakgekialwtknaanetaqvsigkqwkqfldysdsvgfifhddakrldrnaknrytv SEQ ID NO: 5 (eIF4E gene from potato)ATGGCAGCAGCTGAAATGGAGAGAACGACGTCGTTTGATGCAGCTGAGAAGTTGAAGGCCGCCGATGCAGGAGGAGGAGAGGTAGACGATGAACTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAATCAAATGATACGGCGTCGTATTTAGGGAAAGAAATCACAGTGAAACATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTATTGCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAATTTTTTGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCACGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGTCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAGTGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAG SEQ ID NO: 6 (eIF4E form potato, allele 1)MAAAEMERTTSFDAAEKLKAADAGGGEVDDELEEGEIVEESNDTASYLGKEITVKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPIAKSRQTAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVMGADFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMNFLKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRSKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDHSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRSAKNRYTV SEQ ID No: 7 (35S promoter)atggtggagcacgacactctcgtctactccaagaatatcaaagatacagtctcagaagaccaaagggctattgagacttttcaacaaagggtaatatcgggaaacctcctcggattccattgcccagctatctgtcacttcatcaaaaggacagtagaaaaggaaggtggcacctacaaatgccatcattgcgataaaggaaaggctatcgttcaagatgcctctgccgacagtggtcccaaagatggacccccacccacgaggagcatcgtggaaaaagaagacgttccaaccacgtcttcaaagcaagtggattgatgtgaacatggtggagcacgacactctcgtctactccaagaatatcaaagatacagtctcagaagaccaaagggctattgagacttttcaacaaagggtaatatcgggaaacctcctcggattccattgcccagctatctgtcacttcatcaaaaggacagtagaaaaggaaggtggcacctacaaatgccatcattgcgataaaggaaaggctatcgttcaagatgcctctgccgacagtggtcccaaagatggacccccacccacgaggagcatcgtggaaaaagaagacgttccaaccacgtcttcaaagcaagtggattgatgtgatatctccactgacgtaagggatgacgcacaatcccactatccttcgcaagacccttcctctatataaggaagttcatttcatttggagaggacacgctgaaatcaccagtctctctctacaaatctatctct SEQ ID NO: 8 (ubi3 terminator)gccaaagcacatacttatcgatttaaatttcatcgaagagattaatatcgaataatcatatacatactttaaatacataacaaattttaaatacatatatctggtatataattaattttttaaagtcatgaagtatgtatcaaatacacatatggaaaaaattaactattcataatttaaaaaatagaaaagatacatctagtgaaattaggtgcatgtatcaaatacattaggaaaagggcatatatcttgatctagataattaacgattttgatttatgtataatttccaaatgaaggtttatatctacttcagaaataacaatatacttttatcagaacattcaacaaagtaacaaccaactagagtgaaaaatacacattgttctctaaacatacaaaattgagaaaagaatctcaaaatttagagaaacaaatctgaatttctagaagaaaaaaataattatgcactttgctattgctcgaaaaataaatgaaagaaattagacttttttaaaagatgttagactagatatactcaaaagctatcaaaggagtaatattcttcttacattaagtattttagttacagtcctgtaattaaagacacattttagattgtatctaaacttaaatgtatctagaatacatatatttgaatgcatcatatacatgtatccgacacaccaattctcataaaaagcgtaatatcctaaactaatttatccttcaagtcaacttaagcccaatatacattttcatctctaaaggcccaagtggcacaaaatgtcaggcccaattacgaagaaaagggcttgtaaaaccctaataaagtggcactggcagagcttacactctcattccatcaacaaagaaaccctaaaagccgcagcgccactgatttctctcctccaggcgaagatgcagatcttcgtgaagaccctaacggggaagacgatcaccctagaggttgagtcttccgacaccatcgacaatgtcaaagccaagatccaggacaaggaagggattcccccagaccagcagcgtttgattttcgccggaaagcagcttgaggatggtcgtactcttgccgactacaacatccagaaggagtcaactctccatctcgtgctccgtctccgtggtggtg SEQ ID No: 9 (Pat promoter)cacattgattgagttttatatgcaatatagtaataataataatatttcttataaagcaagaggtcaatttttttttattataccaacgtcactaaattatatttgataatgtaaaacaattcaattttacttaaatatcatgaaataaactatttttataaccaaattactaaatttttccaataaaaaaaagtcattaagaagacataaaataaatttgagtaaaaagagtgaagtcgactgacttttttttttttatcataagaaaataaattattaactttaacctaataaaacactaatataatttcatggaatctaatacttacctcttagaaataagaaaaagtgtttctaatagaccctcaatttacattaaatattttcaatcaaatttaaataacaaatatcaatatgaggtcaataacaatatcaaaataatatgaaaaaagagcaatacataatataagaaagaagatttaagtgcgattatcaaggtagtattatatcctaatttgctaatatttaaactcttatatttaaggtcatgttcatgataaacttgaaatgcgctatattagagcatatattaaaataaaaaaatacctaaaataaaattaagttatttttagtatatatttttttacatgacctacatttttctgggtttttctaaaggagcgtgtaagtgtcgacctcattctcctaattttccccaccacataaaaattaaaaaggaaaggtagcttttgcgtgttgttttggtacactacacctcattattacacgtgtcctcatataattggttaaccctatgaggcggtttcgtctagagtcggccatgccatctataaaatgaagctttctgcacctcatttttttcatcttctatctgatttctattataatttctctcaattgccttcaaatttctctttaaggttagaaatcttctctatttttggtttttgtctgtttagattctcgaattagctaatcaggtgctgttatagcccttaattttgagttttttttcggttgttttgatggaaaaggcctaaaatttgagtttttttacgttggtttgatggaaaaggcctacaattggagttttccccgttgttttgatgaaaaagcccctagtttgagattttttttctgtcgattcgattctaaaggtttaaaattagagtttttacatttgtttgatgaaaaaggccttaaatttgagtttttccggttgatttgatgaaaaagccctagaatttgtgttttttcgtcggtttgattctgaaggcctaaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagttttttccccgtgttttagattgtttggttttaattctcgaatcagctaatcagggagtgtgaaaagccctaaaatttgagtttttttcgttgttctgattgttgtttttatgaatttgcagatgcagatctttgtgaaaactctcaccggaaagactatcaccctagaggtggaaagttctgatacaatcgacaacgttaaggctaagatccaggataaggaaggaattcccccggatcagcaaaggcttatcttcgccggaaagcagttggaggacggacgtactctagctgattacaacatccagaaggagtctaccctccatttggtgctccgtctacgtggaggt SEQ ID No: 10 (EIF4E leader and trailer)CACCTCCATCAACAATATTCAAAGAGAATTGTACTACAGAGGAATAATAGGGAGCCTGGGGAAGTAATGCAGAACACGCGAATTGTAGAGGCATGGATTCAAACCAAACAATTTTCCGCGATTAGAAAGTGCAAACACCAATACACGAGTTACTCAAACCAGAAGCTTATCAAATGAGAAACAAAACCAGTGCCTACCAACTTTCCAGTACGAATTGTGTTTCTTGCATTCCCACATTGCATCAAGAACTAATTTGCTGCTCTGTGGACTGTGGAGCACTTTTTTTSEQ ID No: 11 (all-native transfer DNA for PVY resistance)tcgagcacattgattgagttttatatgcaatatagtaataataataatatttcttataaagcaagaggtcaatttttttttaattataccaacgtcactaaattatatttgataatgtaaaacaattcaattttacttaaatatcatgaaataaactatttttataaccaaattactaaatttttccaataaaaaaaagtcattaagaagacataaaataaatttgagtaaaaagagtgaagtcgactgactttttttttttttatcataagaaaataaattattaactttaacctaataaaacactaatataatttcatggaatctaatacttacctcttagaaataagaaaaagtgtttctaatagaccctcaatttacattaaatattttcaatcaaatttaaataacaaatatcaatatgaggtcaataacaatatcaaaataatatgaaaaaagagcaatacataatataagaaagaagatttaagtgcgattatcaaggtagtattatatcctaatttgctaatatttaaactcttatatttaaggtcatgttcatgataaacttgaaatgcgctatattagagcatatattaaaataaaaaaatacctaaaataaaattaagttatttttagtatatatttttttacatgacctacatttttctgggtttttctaaaggagcgtgtaagtgtcgacctcattctcctaattttccccaccacataaaaattaaaaaggaaaggtagcttttgcgtgttgttttggtacactacacctcattattacacgtgtcctcatataattggttaaccctatgaggcggtttcgtctagagtcggccatgccatctataaaatgaagctttctgcacctcatttttttcatcttctatctgatttctattataatttctctcaattgccttcaaatttctctttaaggttagaaatcttctctatttttggtttttgtctgtttagattctcgaattagctaatcaggtgctgttatagcccttaattttgagttttttttcggttgtcttgatggaaaaggcctaaaatttgagtttttttacgttggtttgatggaaaaggcctacaattggagttttccccgttgttttgatgaaaaagcccctagtttgagattttttttctgtcgattcgattctaaaggtttaaaattagagtttttacatttgtttgatgaaaaaggccttaaatttgagtttttccggttgatttgatgaaaaagccctagaatttgtgttttttcgtcggtttgattctgaaggcctaaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagttttttccccgtgttttagattgtttggttttaattctcgaatcagctaatcagggagtgtgaaaagccctaaatttgagtttttttcgttgttctgattgttgtttttatgaatttgcagatgcagatctttgtgaaaactctcaccggaaagactatcaccctagaggtggaaagttctgatacaatcgacaacgttaaggctaagatccaggataaggaaggaattcccccggatcagcaaaggcttatcttcgccggaaagcagttggaggacggacgtactctagctgattacaacatccagaaggagtctaccctccatttggtgctccgtctacgtggaggtggatccatggcagcagctgaaatggagagaacgacgtcgtttgatgcagctgagaagttgaaggccgccgatgcaggaggaggagaggtagacgatgaacttgaagaaggtgaaattgttgaagaatcaaatgatgcggcgtcgtatttggggaaagaaatcacagtgaagcatccattggagcattcatggactttttggtttgataaccctactgctagatctcgacaaattgattggggaagctcacttcgaaatgtctacactttctccactgttgaagatttttggggtgcttacaataatatccatcacccaagcaagttggttatgggagcagactttcattgttttaagcataaaattgagccaaagtgggaagatcctatatgttccaatggagggacgtggaaaatgagtttttcgaagggtaaatctgataccagctggctatatacgctgctggcaatgattggacatcaattcgatcatggagatgaaatttgtggagcagtcgttaatgtccgggttaagggagaaaaaatagctttgtggaccaagaatgctgcaaatgaaacagctcaggttagcattggtaagcaatggaagcagtttctagattacagcgattcggttggcttcatatttcatgacgatgcaaagaggctcgacagaaatgccaagaatcgttacacagtatagactagtttttaatgtttagcaaatgtcctatcagttttctctttttgtcgaacggtaatttagagttttttttgctatatggattttcgtttttgatgtatgtgacaaccctcgggattgttgatttatttcaaaactaagagtttttgcttattgttctcgtctattttggatatcaatcttagttttatatcttttctagttctctacgtgttaaatgttcaacacactagcaatttggctgcagcgtatggattatggaactatcaagtctgtgggatcgataaatatgcttctcaggaatttgagattttacagtctttatgctcattgggttgagtataatatagtaaaaaaataggtatcgataccgtcgacctcgatcgagggggggccccacattgattgagttttatatgcaatatagtaataataataatatttcttataaagcaagaggtcaatttttttttattataccaacgtcactaaattatatttgataatgtaaaacaattcaattttacttaaatatcatgaaataaactatttttataaccaaattactaaatttttccaataaaaaaaagtcattaagaagacataaaataaatttgagtaaaaagagtgaagtcgactgacttttttttttttatcataagaaaataaattattaactttaacctaataaaacactaatataatttcatggaatctaatacttacctcttagaaataagaaaaagtgtttctaatagaccctcaatttacattaaatattttcaatcaaatttaaataacaaatatcaatatgaggtcaataacaatatcaaaataatatgaaaaaagagcaatacataatataagaaagaagatttaagtgcgattatcaaggtagtattatatcctaatttgctaatatttaaactcttatatttaaggtcatgttcatgataaacttgaaatgcgctatattagagcatatattaaaataaaaaaatacctaaaataaaattaagttatttttagtatatatttttttacatgacctacatttttctgggtttttctaaaggagcgtgtaagtgtcgacctcattctcctaattttccccaccacataaaaattaaaaaggaaaggtagcttttgcgtgttgttttggtacactacacctcattattacacgtgtcctcatataattggttaaccctatgaggcggtttcgtctagagtcggccatgccatctataaaatgaagctttctgcacctcatttttttcatcttctatctgatttctattataatttctctcaattgccttcaaatttctctttaaggttagaaatcttctctatttttggtttttgtctgtttagattctcgaattagctaatcaggtgctgttatagcccttaattttgagttttttttcggttgttttgatggaaaaggcctaaaatttgagtttttttacgttggtttgatggaaaaggcctacaattggagttttccccgttgttttgatgaaaaagcccctagtttgagattttttttctgtcgattcgattctaaaggtttaaaattagagtttttacatttgtttgatgaaaaaggccttaaatttgagtttttccggttgatttgatgaaaaagccctagaatttgtgttttttcgtcggtttgattctgaaggcctaaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagtttctccggctgttttgatgaaaaagccctaaatttgagttttttccccgtgttttagattgtttggttttaattctcgaatcagctaatcagggagtgtgaaaagccctaaaatttgagtttttttcgttgttctgattgttgtttttatgaatttgcagatgcagatctttgtgaaaactctcaccggaaagactatcaccctagaggtggaaagttctgatacaatcgacaacgttaaggctaagatccaggataaggaaggaattcccccggatcagcaaaggcttatcttcgccggaaagcagttggaggacggacgtactctagctgattacaacatccagaaggagtctaccctccatttggtgctccgtctacgtggaggtggatcccacctccatcaacaatattcaaagagaattgtactacagaggaataatagggagcctggggaagtaatgcagaacacgcgaattgtagaggcatggattcaaaccaaacaattttccgcgattagaaagtgcaaacaccaatacacgagttactcaaaccagaagcttatcaaatgagaaacaaaaccagtgcctaccaactttccagtacgaattgtgtttcttgcattcccacattgcatcaagaactaatttgctgctctgtggactgtggagcactttttttgaattcgtaacttttactcatctcctccaattatttctgatttcatgcatgtttccctacattctattatgaatcgtgttatggtgtataaacgttgtttcatatctcatctcatctattctgattttgattctcttgcctactgaatttgaccctactgtaatcggtgataaatgtgaatgcttcctcttcttcttcttcttctcagaaatcaatttctgttttgtttttgttcatctgtagccgcggaaaaaaagtgctccacagtccacagagcagcaaaatagttcttgatgcaatgtgggaatgcaagaaacacaattcgtactggaaagttggtaggcactggttttgtttctcatttgataagcttctggtttgagtaactcgtgtattggtgtttgcactttctaatcgcggaaaattgtttggtttgaatccatgcctctacaattcgcgtgttctgcattacttccccaggctccctattattcctctgtagtacaattctctttgaatattgttgatggaggtgactagtcaccaccacggagacggagcacgagatggagagttgactccttctggatgttgtagtcggcaagagtacgaccatcctcaagctgctttccggcgaaaatcaaacgctgctggtctgggggaatcccttccttgtcctggatcttggctttgacattgtcgatggtgtcggaagactcaacctctagggtgatcgtcttccccgttagggtcttcacgaagatctgcatcttcgcctggaggagagaaatcagtggcgctgcggcttttagggtttctttgttgatggaatgagagtgtaagctctgccagtgccactttattagggttttacaagcccttttcttcgtaattgggcctgacattttgtgccacttgggcctttagagatgaaaatgtatattgggcttaagttgacttgaaggataaattagtttaggatattacgctttttatgagaattggtgtgtcggatacatgtatatgatgcattcaaatatatgtattctagatacatttaagtttagatacaatctaaaatgtgtctttaattacaggactgtaactaaaatacttaatgtaagaagaatattactcctttgatagcttttgagtatatctagtctaacatcttttaaaaaagtctaatttctttcatttatttttcgagcaatagcaaagtgcataattatttttttcttctagaaattcagatttgtttctctaaattttgagattcttttctcaattttgtatgtttagagaacaatgtgtatttttcactctagttggttgttactttgttgaatgttctgataaaagtatattgttatttctgaagtagatataaaccttcatttggaaattatacataaatcaaaatcgttaattatctagatcaagatatatgcccttttcctaatgtatttgatacatgcacctaatttcactagatgtatcttttctattttttaaattatgaatagttaattttttccatatgtgtatttgatacatacttcatgactttaaaaaattaattatataccagatatatgtatttaaaatttgttatgtatttaaagtatgtatatgattattcgatattaatctcttcgatgaaatttaaatcgataagtatgtgctttggc SEQ ID No 12GATTGGGGATCCATGGCAAAGCATCCATTAGAGCAT SEQ ID No 13ATGCTCTAATGGATGCTTTGCCATGGATCCCCAATC SEQ ID No 14 (pvr1-2 cDNA)ATGGCAACAGCTGAAATGGAGAAAACGACGACGTTTGATGAAGCTGAGAAGGTGAAATTGAATGCTAATGAGGCAGATGATGAAGTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAAACTGATGATACGACGTCGTATTTGAGCAAAGAAATAGCAACAAAGCATCCATTAGAGCATTCATGGACTTTCTGGTTTGATAATCCAGAGGCGAAATCGAAACAAGCTGCTTGGGGTAGCTCGCGTCGCAACGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCACCACCCAAGCAAGTTAGTTGTGGGAGCAGACTTACATTGTTTCAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACATGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCAAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTTGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGAAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTAGTTAGTGTCAGAGGTAAGGGAGAAAAAATATCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACGGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTGGATTACAGCGACAGTGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCAAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAA SEQ ID No 15 (pvr1-2-derived fragment)ATGGCAAAGCATCCATTAGAGCATTCATGGACTTTCTGGTTTGATAATCCAGAGGCGAAATCGAAACAAGCTGCTTGGGGTAGCTCGCGTCGCAACGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCACCACCCAAGCAAGTTAGTTGTGGGAGCAAACTTACATTGTTTCAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACATGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCAAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTTGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGAAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTAGTTAGTGTCAGAGGTAAGGGAGAAAAAATATCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACGGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTGGATTACAGCGACAGTGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCAAAGAATCGTTACACCGTATAG SEQ ID No 16(amino acid sequence of the pvr1-2-derived fragment)MATKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPEAKSKQAAWGSSRRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVVGANLHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHEDEICGAVVSVRGKGEKISLWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV Seq ID NO 17(Amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with pvr1-2 mutations)MAKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPEAKSRQTAWGSSRRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVMGANFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMNFLKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRSKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRSAKNRYTV* Seq ID NO 18(DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pvr1-2 mutations)ATGGCAAAACATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTGAAGCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCAAGACGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAAACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAATTTTTTGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCACGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGTCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAGTGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAG SEQ ID NO: 19(DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp1 mutations)ATGGCAAAGCATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAACCCTACTGCTAGATCTCGACAAATTGATTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTATATGTTCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAATGTCCGGGTTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCATGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAG SEQ ID NO: 20(amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp1 mutations)MAKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPTARSRQIDWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNTHHPSKLVMGADFHCFKHKIFPKWEDPICSNGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVNVRVKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV Seq ID No 21(Amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp2 mutations)MAKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPIAKSRQTAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYYNIHHPSKLVMGADFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSEPKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRAKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV Seq ID No 22(DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with pwp2 mutations)ATGGCAAAGCATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTATTGCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACTATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTATGGGAGCAGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAGTTTTCCGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGGCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATGCTGCAAACGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGCAAACAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTTAG Seq ID No 23(Amino acid sequence of deleted potato fragment with mpe mutations)MAKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPIPKSRQTAWGSSLRNVYTESTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVHDFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMNFLKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRSKGEKIALWTKNSANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRSAKNRYTV* Seq ID No 24(DNA sequence of deleted potato fragment with mpe mutations)ATGGCAAAACATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTATTCCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTCACGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAATTTTTTGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCACGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGTCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATAGTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAGTGCCAAGAATCGTTACACAGTATAG SEQ ID No 25 DXXXXKSBQXAWGSSXRXXYTFSXVEXFWXXYNNIHBPSKLXXGADSEQ ID No 26 (modified CaeIF4E, DNA sequence 1)ATGGCAACAGCTGAAATGGAGAAAACGACGACGTTTGATGAAGCTGAGAAGGTGAAATTGAATGCTAATGAGGCAGATGATGAAGTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAAACTGATGATACGACGTCGTATTTGAGCAAAGAAATAGCAACAAAGCATCCATTAGAGCATTCATGGACTTTCTGGTTTGATAATCCAGTGCCGAAATCGAAACAAGCTGCTTGGGGTAGCTCGCTTCGCAACGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCACCACCCAAGCAAGTTAGTTCACGACTTACATTGTTTCAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACATGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCAAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTTGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGAAGATGAAATTTGTGGGGCAGTAGTTAGTGTCAGAGGTAAGGGAGAAAAAATATCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATTCTGCAAATGAAACGGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTGGATTACAGCGACAGTGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCAAAGAATCGTTACACCGTATAG SEQ ID No 27 (modified CaeIF4E, amino acid sequence 1)MATAEMEKTTTFDEAEKVKLNANEADDEVEEGEIVEETDDTTSYLSKEIATKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPVPKSKQAAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVHDLHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHEDEICGAVVSVRGKGEKISLWTKNSANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV SEQ ID No 28  (modified CaeIF4E, DNA sequence 2)ATGGCAACAGCTGAAATGGAGAAAACGACGACGTTTGATGAAGCTGAGAAGGTGAAATTGAATGCTAATGAGGCAGATGATGAAGTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAAACTGATGATACGACGTCGTATTTGAGCAAAGAAATAGCAACAAAGCATCCATTAGAGCATTCATGGACTTTCTGGTTTGATAATCCAGTGCCGAAATCGAAACAAGCTGCTTGGGGTAGCTCGCTTCGCAACGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGATTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCACCACCCAAGCAAGTTAGTTCACGACTTACATTGTTTCAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACATGGAAAATGAGTTTTTCAAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTTGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCATGAAGATGAAATTTGTGGGGCAGTAGTTAGTGTCAGAGGTAAGGGAGAAAAAATATCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATTCTGCAAATGAAACGGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTGGATTACAGCGACAGTGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGACGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAATGCAAAGAATCGTTACACCGTATAG SEQ ID No 29 (modified CaeIF4E, amino acid sequence 2)MATAEMEKTTTFDEAEKVKLNANEADDEVEEGEIVEETDDTTSYLSKEIATKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPVPKSKQAAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVHDLHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHEDEICGAVVSVRGKGEKISLWTKNSANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV SEQ ID No 30(modified StEIF4E, DNA sequence)ATGGCAGCAGCTGAAATGGAGAGAACGACGTCGTTTGATGCAGCTGAGAAGTTGAAGGCCGCCGATGCAGGAGGAGGAGAGGTAGACGATGAACTTGAAGAAGGTGAAATTGTTGAAGAATCAAATGATACGGCGTCGTATTTAGGGAAAGAAATCACAGTGAAACATCCATTGGAGCATTCATGGACTTTTTGGTTTGATAGCCCTATTCCTAAATCTCGACAAACTGCTTGGGGAAGCTCACTTCGAAATGTCTACACTTTCTCCACTGTTGAAGAGTTTTGGGGTGCTTACAATAATATCCATCACCCAAGCAAGTTGGTTCACGACTTTCATTGTTTTAAGCATAAAATTGAGCCAAAGTGGGAAGATCCTGTATGTGCCAATGGAGGGACGTGGAAAATGAATTTTTTGAAGGGTAAATCTGATACCAGCTGGCTATATACGCTGCTGGCAATGATTGGACATCAATTCGATCACGGAGATGAAATTTGTGGAGCAGTCGTTAGTGTCCGGTCTAAGGGAGAAAAAATAGCTTTGTGGACCAAGAATACTGCAAATGAAACAGCTCAGGTTAGCATTGGTAAGCAATGGAAGCAGTTTCTAGATTACAGCGATTCGGTTGGCTTCATATTTCACGATGATGCAAAGAGGCTCGACAGAAGTGCCAAGAATCGTTATTCCGTGTAG SEQ ID No 31 (modified StEIF4E, amino acid sequence)MAAAEMERTTSFDAAEKLKAADAGGGEVDDELEEGEIVEESNDTASYLGKEITVKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPIPKSRQTAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEEFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVHDFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMNFLKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRSKGEKIALWTKNTANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRSAKNRYSV SEQ ID NO: 32(pvr1-2 amino acid sequence)MATAEMEKTTTFDEAEKVKLNANEADDEVEEGEIVEETDDTTSYLSKEIATKHPLEHSWTFWFDNPEAKSKQAAWGSSRRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVVGADLHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTLLAMIGHQFDHEDEICGAVVSVRGKGEKISLWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV* SEQ ID NO: 33 (Potato border-like sequence)GTTTACAGTACCATATATCCTGTCAGAGGTATAGAGGCATGACTGGCATGATCACTAAATTGATGCCCACAGAGGAGACTTATAACCTACAGGGGCACGTAGTTCTAGGACTTGAAAGTGACTGACCGTAGTCCAACTCGGTATAAAGCCTACTCCCAACTAAATATATGAAATTTATAGCATAACTGCAGATGAGCTCGATTCTAGAGTAGGTACCGAGCTCGAATTCCTTACTCCTCCACAAAGCCGTAACTGAAGCGACTTCTATTTTTCTCAACCTTCGGACCTGACGATCAAGAATCTCAATAGGTAGTTCTTCATAAGTGAGACTATCCTTCATAGCTACACTTTCTAAAGGTACGATAGATTTTGGATCAACCACACACACTTCGTTTACACCGGTATATATCCTGCCA SEQ ID NO: 34(consensus sequence of the border-like sequence)YGRYAGGATATATWSNVBKGTAAWY SEQ ID NO: 35(potato eIF4E gene, allele 2, amino acid sequence)MAAAEMERTTSFDAADKLKAADAGGGEVDDELEEGEIVEESNDTASYLGKEITVKHPLEHSWTFWFDSPIAKSRQTAWGSSLRNVYTFSTVEDFWGAYNNIHHPSKLVMGADFHCFKHKIEPKWEDPVCANGGTWKMSFSKGKSDTSWLYTPLAMIGHQFDHGDEICGAVVSVRAKGEKIALWTKNAANETAQVSIGKQWKQFLDYSDSVGFIFHDDAKRLDRNAKNRYTV

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for conferring PVY resistance to aSolanum tuberosum plant, said method comprising: (A) transforming theSolanum tuberosum plant with a construct comprising a polynucleotideencoding an N-terminal-truncated fragment of a full-length eIF4Epolypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ IDNO: 4, and SEQ ID NO:32; and (B) expressing said polynucleotide in acell of the plant; wherein said transformed Solanum tuberosum plant isresistant to PVY infection.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein theN-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by the polynucleotide is selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO:20, and SEQ ID NO:
 21. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein theN-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by the polynucleotide is SEQ IDNO:
 16. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the Solanum tuberosum plantpossesses one or more additional traits selected from the groupconsisting of: (i) low reducing sugar, (ii) low free asparagine, (iii)low bruising, (iv) reduced cold-induced sweetening, (v) low acrylamide,(vi) resistance to Phytophthora, (vii) reduced starch phosphate level,and (viii) increased antioxidant.
 5. A Solanum tuberosum plant, plantpart, plant cell, or plant tissue culture comprising a polynucleotideencoding an N-terminal-truncated fragment of a full-length eIF4Epolypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ IDNO: 4, SEQ ID NO:32, wherein said Solanum tuberosum plant, or a plantproduced from said plant part, plant cell, or plant tissue culture,expresses said polynucleotide and is resistant to PVY infection.
 6. TheSolanum tuberosum plant, plant part, plant cell, or plant tissue cultureof claim 5, wherein the N-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by thepolynucleotide is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 16,SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 20, and SEQ ID NO:
 21. 7. The Solanumtuberosum plant, plant part, plant cell, or plant tissue culture ofclaim 6, wherein the N-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by thepolynucleotide is SEQ ID NO:
 16. 8. The Solanum tuberosum plant of claim5, wherein the plant possesses one or more additional traits selectedfrom the group consisting of: (i) low reducing sugar, (ii) low freeasparagine, (iii) low bruising, (iv) reduced cold-induced sweetening,(v) low acrylamide, (vi) resistance to Phytophthora, (vii) reducedstarch phosphate level, and (viii) increased antioxidant.
 9. A progenyplant of the Solanum tuberosum plant of claim 5, wherein the progenySolanum tuberosum plant is resistant to PVY as a result of inheritingthe nucleic acid encoding the N-terminal-truncated eIF4E fragment.
 10. ADNA construct comprising a polynucleotide encoding anN-terminal-truncated fragment of an eIF4E polypeptide, wherein theN-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by the polynucleotide is selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO:20, and SEQ ID NO:
 21. 11. The DNA construct of claim 10, wherein theN-terminal-truncated fragment encoded by the polynucleotide is SEQ IDNO: 16.